These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24049575)
1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported crown in fibula bone model. Park YS; Kwon HB J Adv Prosthodont; 2013 Aug; 5(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 24049575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the splinted implant prosthesis in a reconstructed mandible. Heo KH; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Apr; 10(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 29713435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method. Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Jun JC; Jiang XF; Wang R; Baur DA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30482534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution and micromotion analyses of immediately loaded implants of varying lengths in the mandible and fibular bone grafts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Wu JC; Chen CS; Yip SW; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e77-84. PubMed ID: 23057046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. Sevimay M; Usumez A; Eskitascioglu G J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 15742379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study. Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical effects of human mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts. Tie Y; Wang DM; Ji T; Wang CT; Zhang CP J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16781160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments]. Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant. Moon SY; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 9(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28243389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study. Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest. Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Different Implant Configurations in Enlarged First Molar Areas. Unsal GS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):675-683. PubMed ID: 32724918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis. Nesappan T; Ariga P J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Aug; 8(8):ZC45-50. PubMed ID: 25302267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]