These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24050381)

  • 1. Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods.
    Chandler J; Hopewell S
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():76. PubMed ID: 24050381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group.
    McKenzie JE; Salanti G; Lewis SC; Altman DG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():80. PubMed ID: 24280020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evidence-based medicine: systematic reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration].
    López Arrieta JM; Qizilbash N
    Med Clin (Barc); 1996 Nov; 107(15):581-5. PubMed ID: 9064383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Cochrane Collaboration: the present and the future].
    Nakayama T; Tsutani K
    Nihon Rinsho; 2001 Feb; 59(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 11218416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.
    Clarke M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):176. PubMed ID: 30368251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Systematic reviews on infectious diseases. The Cochrane Collaboration].
    Bonfill X; Martí J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999; 17 Suppl 2():15-21. PubMed ID: 10605185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):689-92. PubMed ID: 17683315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is a Cochrane review?
    Cipriani A; Furukawa TA; Barbui C
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2011 Sep; 20(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 21922964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Cochrane Collaboration.
    Levin A
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Aug; 135(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 11511165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.
    Furlan AD; Pennick V; Bombardier C; van Tulder M;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1929-41. PubMed ID: 19680101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
    Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews.
    Babić A; Poklepovic Pericic T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):884-890. PubMed ID: 32890455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Helping people make well-informed decisions about health care: old and new challenges to achieving the aim of the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Oxman AD
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():77. PubMed ID: 24050439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Turner L; Boutron I; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():79. PubMed ID: 24059942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of handsearching European general health care journals to the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
    McDonald S; Lefebvre C; Antes G; Galandi D; Gøtzsche P; Hammarquist C; Haugh M; Jensen KL; Kleijnen J; Loep M; Pistotti V; Rüther A
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Mar; 25(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 11868446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.