These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24050485)

  • 1. Commonly used data-collection approaches in clinical research.
    Saczynski JS; McManus DD; Goldberg RJ
    Am J Med; 2013 Nov; 126(11):946-50. PubMed ID: 24050485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.
    Matza LS; Patrick DL; Riley AW; Alexander JJ; Rajmil L; Pleil AM; Bullinger M
    Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):461-79. PubMed ID: 23796280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gathering data from older adults via proxy respondents: research challenges.
    Wolinsky FD; Jones MP; Wehby GL
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Nov; 1(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 24236462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness research methods: symposium overview and summary.
    Lohr KN
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S3-6. PubMed ID: 20473188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.
    Wingo PA; Ory HW; Layde PM; Lee NC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jul; 128(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 3381827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of medical records and patient questionnaires as sources for the estimation of costs within research studies and the implications for economic evaluation.
    Gillespie P; O'Shea E; Smith SM; Cupples ME; Murphy AW
    Fam Pract; 2016 Dec; 33(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 27587565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research.
    Cowie MR; Blomster JI; Curtis LH; Duclaux S; Ford I; Fritz F; Goldman S; Janmohamed S; Kreuzer J; Leenay M; Michel A; Ong S; Pell JP; Southworth MR; Stough WG; Thoenes M; Zannad F; Zalewski A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 106(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27557678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some strategies to address the challenges of collecting observational data in a busy clinical environment.
    Jackson D; McDonald G; Luck L; Waine M; Wilkes L
    Collegian; 2016; 23(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 27188039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Routinely collected data and comparative effectiveness evidence: promises and limitations.
    Hemkens LG; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Ioannidis JPA
    CMAJ; 2016 May; 188(8):E158-E164. PubMed ID: 26883316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A data-driven concept schema for defining clinical research data needs.
    Hruby GW; Hoxha J; Ravichandran PC; Mendonça EA; Hanauer DA; Weng C
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Jul; 91():1-9. PubMed ID: 27185504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of the Task Force Report on PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes.
    McLeod L
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 25128040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Saturation sampling in qualitative health research: theoretical contributions].
    Fontanella BJ; Ricas J; Turato ER
    Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Jan; 24(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 18209831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparation, piloting and validation for a longitudinal birth cohort study.
    Golding J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():201-12. PubMed ID: 19490457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NINDS common data element project: a long-awaited breakthrough in streamlining trials.
    Stone K
    Ann Neurol; 2010 Jul; 68(1):A11-3. PubMed ID: 20583225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
    Witt CM
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for monitoring of new drugs in Sweden.
    Cars T; Lindhagen L; Sundström J
    Ups J Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 124(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 30689485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations on the use of patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.
    Alemayehu D; Sanchez RJ; Cappelleri JC
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S27-33. PubMed ID: 22074672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.