201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24050822)
1. Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.
Vaz Freitas S; Pestana PM; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24050822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Özcebe E; Aydinli FE; Tiğrak TK; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic parameters for classification of breathiness in continuous speech according to the GRBAS scale.
Stráník A; Čmejla R; Vokřál J
J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):653.e9-653.e17. PubMed ID: 24755168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Disorder in Children Who Have Had Laryngotracheal Reconstruction Surgery and the Relationship Between Clinician Perceptual Ratingof Voice Quality and Parent Proxy/Child Self-Report of Voice-Related Quality of Life.
Cohen W; Lloyd S; Wynne DM; Townsley RB
J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):945.e27-945.e35. PubMed ID: 30146234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality.
Lee M; Drinnan M; Carding P
Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 16209679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
