BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24050822)

  • 21. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and Validation of Sentences in Tamil for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Voice Using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
    Venkatraman Y; Mahalingam S; Boominathan P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 65(12):4539-4556. PubMed ID: 36368051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the reliability of Grade, Roughness and Breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli.
    Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Lucero JC
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24117123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability and Correlations Between Overall Severity, Roughness and Breathiness in the Perception of Dysphonic Voices: Investigating Cognitive Aspects.
    Ghio A; Revis J; Smithson-Barrière D; Jarzé S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2024 Jan; 38(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 34452778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Application research on RBH perceptual evaluation of voice disorders].
    Li Y; Zheng HL; Wang W; Li M; Chen SC; Chen DH
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 48(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 24103168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance.
    Dejonckere PH; Obbens C; de Moor GM; Wieneke GH
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 8325573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
    Karnell MP; Melton SD; Childes JM; Coleman TC; Dailey SA; Hoffman HT
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 16822648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
    Alves JDN; Almeida AAF; Yamasaki R; Lopes LW
    Codas; 2024; 36(3):e20230175. PubMed ID: 38629682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale.
    Yamaguchi H; Shrivastav R; Andrews ML; Niimi S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 12771466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
    Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 9865100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can we perceptually rate alaryngeal voice? Developing the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.
    Hurren A; Hildreth AJ; Carding PN
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20070762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.
    Webb AL; Carding PN; Deary IJ; MacKenzie K; Steen N; Wilson JA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 261(8):429-34. PubMed ID: 14615893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.
    Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jan; 30(1):228-238. PubMed ID: 33439742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Design of standard voice sample text for subjective auditory perceptual evaluation of voice disorders].
    Li JR; Sun YY; Xu W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 45(9):719-22. PubMed ID: 21092667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An acoustic-perceptual study of vocal tremor.
    Anand S; Shrivastav R; Wingate JM; Chheda NN
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):811.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22921293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Objective Assessment of Pathological Voice Using Artificial Intelligence Based on the GRBAS Scale.
    Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hasebe K; Okanoue Y; Shuya O; Yuki R; Shoji K; Hori R; Kishimoto Y; Omori K
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):561-566. PubMed ID: 34973892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new voice rating tool for clinical practice.
    Gould J; Waugh J; Carding P; Drinnan M
    J Voice; 2012 Jul; 26(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 22209058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.