BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24050984)

  • 1. Diagnosis and diagnostic errors: time for a new paradigm.
    Schiff GD
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24050984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis.
    Murphy DR; Laxmisan A; Reis BA; Thomas EJ; Esquivel A; Forjuoh SN; Parikh R; Khan MM; Singh H
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 23873756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Focused Decision Support: a Data Mining Tool to Query the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Dataset and Guide Screening Management for the Individual Patient.
    Sharma A; Hostetter J; Morrison J; Wang K; Siegel E
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Apr; 29(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 26385814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New cancer screening guidelines say less is more.
    McBride D
    ONS Connect; 2009 Apr; 24(4):19. PubMed ID: 19413237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Murphy DR; Wu L; Thomas EJ; Forjuoh SN; Meyer AN; Singh H
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(31):3560-7. PubMed ID: 26304875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A visual-interactive system for prostate cancer cohort analysis.
    Bernard J; Sessler D; May T; Schlomm T; Pehrke D; Kohlhammer J
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2015; 35(3):44-55. PubMed ID: 26010788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Process mining routinely collected electronic health records to define real-life clinical pathways during chemotherapy.
    Baker K; Dunwoodie E; Jones RG; Newsham A; Johnson O; Price CP; Wolstenholme J; Leal J; McGinley P; Twelves C; Hall G
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jul; 103():32-41. PubMed ID: 28550999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer screening in primary care. Are we communicating?
    Pignone M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Dec; 16(12):867. PubMed ID: 11903768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic medical records and improving the quality of the screening process.
    Fisher DA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 26(7):683-4. PubMed ID: 21538167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Update of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
    Andriole GL
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2014; 202():53-7. PubMed ID: 24531777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Preventive screening in general practice. What examined and how reliable is it?].
    Hansbauer B; Enthaler N; Mahlknecht A; Sönnichsen A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2012 Nov; 154 Spec No 3():46-9; quiz 50. PubMed ID: 23724719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.
    Guiriguet C; Muñoz-Ortiz L; Burón A; Rivero I; Grau J; Vela-Vallespín C; Vilarrubí M; Torres M; Hernández C; Méndez-Boo L; Toràn P; Caballeria L; Macià F; Castells A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jul; 66(648):e483-90. PubMed ID: 27266861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosing cancer in the bush: a mixed-methods study of symptom appraisal and help-seeking behaviour in people with cancer from rural Western Australia.
    Emery JD; Walter FM; Gray V; Sinclair C; Howting D; Bulsara M; Bulsara C; Webster A; Auret K; Saunders C; Nowak A; Holman CD
    Fam Pract; 2013 Jun; 30(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 23363540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive modeling of colorectal cancer using a dedicated pre-processing pipeline on routine electronic medical records.
    Kop R; Hoogendoorn M; Teije AT; Büchner FL; Slottje P; Moons LM; Numans ME
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():30-8. PubMed ID: 27392227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical similarities: an innovative approach for supporting medical decisions.
    Vallati M; Gatta R; De Bari B; Magrini SM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1114. PubMed ID: 23920888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer: to screen or not to screen? A payer's perspective.
    Amundson EP
    S D Med; 2010; Spec No():72. PubMed ID: 20397494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes and beliefs of primary care physicians regarding prostate and colorectal cancer screening in a rural state.
    Philips GK; Reinier K; Ashikaga T; Luebbers RA
    J Cancer Educ; 2005; 20(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 16122365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recording, interpreting, and updating the family history of cancer: implications for cancer prevention.
    Acheson LS
    JAMA; 2011 Jul; 306(2):208-10. PubMed ID: 21750302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation for Accuracy of Cancer Diagnosis in Electronic Medical Records Using a Text Mining Method.
    Lee Y; Shin SY; Ahn SM; Lee JH; Kim WS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():882. PubMed ID: 26262184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the unknown and the unknowable with simulation models.
    Russell LB
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(4):521-3. PubMed ID: 21757646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.