These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2405126)

  • 1. Etched glass ionomer liners: surface properties and interfacial profile with composite resins.
    Papagiannoulis L; Eliades G; Lekka M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jan; 17(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 2405126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of etching glass-ionomer cements on bond strength to composite resin.
    Sheth JJ; Jensen ME; Sheth PJ; Versteeg J
    J Dent Res; 1989 Jun; 68(6):1082-7. PubMed ID: 2681306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of etching time on surface morphology and adhesion of a posterior resin to glass-ionomer cement.
    Joynt RB; Williams D; Davis EL; Wieczkowski G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 2646444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations.
    Gordon M; Wasserstein A; Gorfil C; Imber S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 18(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2037937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding and gap formation of glass-ionomer cement used in conjunction with composite resin.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Jun; 47(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 2667278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal etching time of glass ionomer cement for maximum bond of composite resin.
    Mangum FI; Berry EA; Parikh UK; Ladd D
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 May; 120(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 2186073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro.
    Mathis RS; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acid etching of a glass ionomer cement base: SEM study.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Jun; 35(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 2203329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Schmidlin PR; Huber T; Göhring TN; Attin T; Bindl A
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 19051855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2277155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners.
    Gupta S; Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 12587752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on microleakage in composite restorations with glass ionomer liners.
    Arcoria CJ; Gonzalez JP; Vitasek BA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1533870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of high-strength glass ionomer: resin composite restorations in minimally invasive treatment.
    Platt JA; Rhodes B
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2001-2002 Winter; 80(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 12061017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.