171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24051848)
1. Evaluation of static and dynamic visualization training approaches for users with different spatial abilities.
Froese ME; Tory M; Evans GW; Shrikhande K
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2810-7. PubMed ID: 24051848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension.
Nguyen N; Nelson AJ; Wilson TD
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 22232125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models.
Berney S; Bétrancourt M; Molinari G; Hoyek N
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 25689057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study.
Laidlaw DH; Kirby RM; Jackson CD; Davidson JS; Miller TS; da Silva M; Warren WH; Tarr MJ
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 15631129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The interaction of spatial ability and motor learning in the transfer of training from a simulator to a real task.
Tracey MR; Lathan CE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():521-7. PubMed ID: 11317801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving visualization skills in engineering education.
Contero M; Naya F; Company P; Saorín JL; Conesa J
IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2005; 25(5):24-31. PubMed ID: 16209167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial ability and training in virtual neuroanatomy.
Plumley L; Armstrong R; De Ribaupierre S; Eagleson R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 184():324-9. PubMed ID: 23400179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid-image visualization for large viewing environments.
Isenberg P; Dragicevic P; Willett W; Bezerianos A; Fekete JD
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2346-55. PubMed ID: 24051801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing two types of engineering visualizations: task-related manipulations matter.
Cölln MC; Kusch K; Helmert JR; Kohler P; Velichkovsky BM; Pannasch S
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21497791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An approach to the perceptual optimization of complex visualizations.
House DH; Bair AS; Ware C
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(4):509-21. PubMed ID: 16805260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Information visualization and proxemics: design opportunities and empirical findings.
Jakobsen MR; Sahlemariam Haile Y; Knudsen S; Hornbæk K
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2386-95. PubMed ID: 24051805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of stereoscopic imagery and motion on anatomical structure recognition and visual attention performance.
Remmele M; Schmidt E; Lingenfelder M; Martens A
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28561952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multi-criteria approach to camera motion design for volume data animation.
Hsu WH; Zhang Y; Ma KL
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2792-801. PubMed ID: 24051846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CliniSpace: a multiperson 3D online immersive training environment accessible through a browser.
Dev P; Heinrichs WL; Youngblood P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():173-9. PubMed ID: 21335784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual signatures in video visualization.
Chen M; Botchen RP; Hashim RR; Weiskopf D; Ertl T; Thornton IM
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(5):1093-100. PubMed ID: 17080839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.
Preece D; Williams SB; Lam R; Weller R
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 23349117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information visualization; assisting low spatial individuals with information access tasks through the use of visual mediators.
Stanney KM; Salvendy G
Ergonomics; 1995 Jun; 38(6):1184-98. PubMed ID: 7758446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Explanatory and illustrative visualization of special and general relativity.
Weiskopf D; Borchers M; Ertl T; Falk M; Fechtig O; Frank R; Grave F; King A; Kraus U; Müller T; Nollert HP; Rica Mendez I; Ruder H; Schafhitzel T; Schär S; Zahn C; Zatloukal M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(4):522-34. PubMed ID: 16805261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays.
Tory M; Kirkpatrick AE; Atkins MS; Möller T
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 16382603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The medical exploration toolkit: an efficient support for visual computing in surgical planning and training.
Mühler K; Tietjen C; Ritter F; Preim B
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 19910667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
