These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24052341)

  • 1. The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study.
    Burns EM; Mamidanna R; Currie A; Bottle A; Aylin P; Darzi A; Faiz OD
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 24052341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical multilevel analysis of increased caseload volume and postoperative outcome after elective colorectal surgery.
    Burns EM; Bottle A; Almoudaris AM; Mamidanna R; Aylin P; Darzi A; Nicholls RJ; Faiz OD
    Br J Surg; 2013 Oct; 100(11):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24037577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time to rethink surgeon-specific outcome data for colorectal surgeons in England: Cross-sectional data of 73,842 resections for colorectal cancer.
    Hureibi K; Evans C; Wong L; Ain Q
    Int J Surg; 2018 Sep; 57():101-104. PubMed ID: 30142386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of surgeon and hospital caseload on the likelihood of performing laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: a study based on 55,949 patients.
    Weber WP; Guller U; Jain NB; Pietrobon R; Oertli D
    Arch Surg; 2007 Mar; 142(3):253-9; discussion 259. PubMed ID: 17372050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical Unit volume and 30-day reoperation rate following primary resection for colorectal cancer in the Veneto Region (Italy).
    Pucciarelli S; Chiappetta A; Giacomazzo G; Barina A; Gennaro N; Rebonato M; Nitti D; Saugo M
    Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Jan; 20(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 26573812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy.
    Yasunaga H; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K;
    Surg Today; 2009; 39(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 19882317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based study.
    Liu CJ; Chou YJ; Teng CJ; Lin CC; Lee YT; Hu YW; Yeh CM; Chen TJ; Huang N
    Cancer; 2015 Aug; 121(16):2782-90. PubMed ID: 25892632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal surgery in a rural setting.
    Tebala GD
    Updates Surg; 2015 Dec; 67(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 26545384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection for laparoscopic resection confers a survival benefit in colorectal cancer surgery in England.
    Askari A; Nachiappan S; Currie A; Bottle A; Athanasiou T; Faiz O
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3839-47. PubMed ID: 27059969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of Emergency Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study in England.
    Vallance AE; Keller DS; Hill J; Braun M; Kuryba A; van der Meulen J; Walker K; Chand M
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 29621034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prolonged hospital stay and readmission rate in an enhanced recovery after surgery cohort undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
    Bennedsen ALB; Eriksen JR; Gögenur I
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 30307103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis.
    Dolejs SC; Waters JA; Ceppa EP; Zarzaur BL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2387-2396. PubMed ID: 27655383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of surgeon volume on patient safety in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
    Worley MJ; Anwandter C; Sun CC; dos Reis R; Nick AM; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback CF; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):241-4. PubMed ID: 22240566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volume analysis of outcome following restorative proctocolectomy.
    Burns EM; Bottle A; Aylin P; Clark SK; Tekkis PP; Darzi A; Nicholls RJ; Faiz O
    Br J Surg; 2011 Mar; 98(3):408-17. PubMed ID: 21254018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.
    Akagi T; Inomata M; Etoh T; Yasuda K; Shiraishi N; Kitano S
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Jun; 21(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 21654303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals.
    Kolfschoten NE; van Leersum NJ; Gooiker GA; Marang van de Mheen PJ; Eddes EH; Kievit J; Brand R; Tanis PJ; Bemelman WA; Tollenaar RA; Meijerink J; Wouters MW
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):916-21. PubMed ID: 22735713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.
    Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic colectomy in a district hospital: the single surgeon can be safe.
    Aikoye AA; Khushal A; Parkin C; Bates T
    Acta Chir Belg; 2017 Aug; 117(4):216-222. PubMed ID: 28636471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.