104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24052361)
1. Evaluating confocal microscopy system performance.
Zucker RM
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1075():321-74. PubMed ID: 24052361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.
Zucker RM
Methods Mol Biol; 2006; 319():77-135. PubMed ID: 16719352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.
Zucker RM; Price O
Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):273-94. PubMed ID: 11500845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide based systems: performance.
Zucker RM
Cytometry A; 2006 Jul; 69(7):659-76. PubMed ID: 16807897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance.
Zucker RM; Price OT
Methods; 1999 Aug; 18(4):447-58. PubMed ID: 10491274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical evaluation of confocal microscopy images.
Zucker RM; Price OT
Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 11500846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. International test results for objective lens quality, resolution, spectral accuracy and spectral separation for confocal laser scanning microscopes.
Cole RW; Thibault M; Bayles CJ; Eason B; Girard AM; Jinadasa T; Opansky C; Schulz K; Brown CM
Microsc Microanal; 2013 Dec; 19(6):1653-68. PubMed ID: 24103552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide-based systems: instability.
Zucker RM
Cytometry A; 2006 Jul; 69(7):677-90. PubMed ID: 16807898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of confocal microscopy spectral imaging systems: use of multispectral beads.
Zucker RM; Rigby P; Clements I; Salmon W; Chua M
Cytometry A; 2007 Mar; 71(3):174-89. PubMed ID: 17266146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advances in laser sources for confocal and multiphoton microscopy.
Girkin JM; McConnell G
Microsc Res Tech; 2005 May; 67(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16025485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative confocal microscopy: beyond a pretty picture.
Jonkman J; Brown CM; Cole RW
Methods Cell Biol; 2014; 123():113-34. PubMed ID: 24974025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Far-field optical nanoscopy based on continuous wave laser stimulated emission depletion.
Kuang C; Zhao W; Wang G
Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 May; 81(5):053709. PubMed ID: 20515147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method of calibration of a fluorescence microscope for quantitative studies.
Kedziora KM; Prehn JH; Dobrucki J; Bernas T
J Microsc; 2011 Oct; 244(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 21756257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Note: A three-dimensional calibration device for the confocal microscope.
Jensen KE; Weitz DA; Spaepen F
Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Jan; 84(1):016108. PubMed ID: 23387714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polarization conversion in confocal microscopy with radially polarized illumination.
Tang WT; Yew EY; Sheppard CJ
Opt Lett; 2009 Jul; 34(14):2147-9. PubMed ID: 19823530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible structured illumination microscope with a programmable illumination array.
Křížek P; Raška I; Hagen GM
Opt Express; 2012 Oct; 20(22):24585-99. PubMed ID: 23187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laser scanning confocal microscope with programmable amplitude, phase, and polarization of the illumination beam.
Boruah BR; Neil MA
Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Jan; 80(1):013705. PubMed ID: 19191439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality control protocol for confocal systems.
Cornea A
Methods Cell Biol; 2013; 113():51-8. PubMed ID: 23317897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration and standardization of the emission light path of confocal microscopes.
Cho EH; Lockett SJ
J Microsc; 2006 Jul; 223(Pt 1):15-25. PubMed ID: 16872427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Quantitative Measure of Field Illumination.
Brown CM; Reilly A; Cole RW
J Biomol Tech; 2015 Jul; 26(2):37-44. PubMed ID: 25802488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
