These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24053206)
1. Synoptic pathology reporting for thyroid cancer: a review and institutional experience. Lam E; Vy N; Bajdik C; Strugnell SS; Walker B; Wiseman SM Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1073-9. PubMed ID: 24053206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists? Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists. Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist. Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach. Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists. Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports. Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma. Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG; Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project. Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis. Hamady ZZ; Mather N; Lansdown MR; Davidson L; Maclennan KA Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15642429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of synoptic cytology reporting on fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules. Tsan CJ; Serpell JW; Poh YY ANZ J Surg; 2007 Nov; 77(11):991-5. PubMed ID: 17931264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of template format on the completeness of surgical pathology reports. Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M; Touriz M; Renshaw A; Gould EW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jan; 138(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 24377820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone Marrow Synoptic Reporting for Hematologic Neoplasms: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Sever C; Abbott CL; de Baca ME; Khoury JD; Perkins SL; Reichard KK; Taylor A; Terebelo HR; Colasacco C; Rumble RB; Thomas NE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Sep; 140(9):932-49. PubMed ID: 26905483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting. Hammond EH; Flinner RL Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of implementation of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology on the quality of reporting, "risk" of malignancy, surgical rate, and rate of frozen sections requested for thyroid lesions. Crowe A; Linder A; Hameed O; Salih C; Roberson J; Gidley J; Eltoum IA Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Oct; 119(5):315-21. PubMed ID: 21751427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports. Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma. Karim RZ; van den Berg KS; Colman MH; McCarthy SW; Thompson JF; Scolyer RA Histopathology; 2008 Jan; 52(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18184262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]