These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24054735)

  • 1. A comparison of 2 laboratory methods to test dental unit waterline water quality.
    Porteous N; Sun Y; Dang S; Schoolfield J
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Nov; 77(3):206-8. PubMed ID: 24054735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of sampling and laboratory procedures for determination of heterotrophic plate counts in dental unit waterlines.
    Noce L; Di Giovanni D; Putnins EE
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 May; 66(5):262. PubMed ID: 10859729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of agar-based methods for the isolation and enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria with the new multidose IDEXX SimPlate method.
    Vulindlu M; Charlett A; Surman S; Lee JV
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(1):277-80. PubMed ID: 15318522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods.
    Porteous N; Sun Y; Schoolfield J
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 25574718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of methods to enumerate bacteria in dental unit water lines.
    Karpay RI; Plamondon TJ; Mills SE
    Curr Microbiol; 1999 Feb; 38(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 9871113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the Effects of Two Culture Methods to Determine the Total Heterotrophic Bacterial Colony Count in Hospital Purified Water.
    Cao X; Xiong H; Fan Y; Xiong L
    J Epidemiol Glob Health; 2024 Mar; 14(1):184-192. PubMed ID: 38358615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring of bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence.
    Watanabe A; Tamaki N; Yokota K; Matsuyama M; Kokeguchi S
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Dec; 94(4):393-396. PubMed ID: 27597265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review.
    Wu M; Shi Z; Yu X; Xu Y; Jin X; Zhang L; Fu B
    J Med Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 35670283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formation and decontamination of biofilms in dental unit waterlines.
    Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW; Rowland RW
    J Periodontol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1595-609. PubMed ID: 14682656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental unit waterline contamination and its possible implications during periodontal surgery.
    Putnins EE; Di Giovanni D; Bhullar AS
    J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 11327068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of ultrasonic scaling unit waterline contamination after use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse lavage.
    Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW JR
    J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 11327069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental unit waterlines: review and product evaluation.
    Panagakos FS; Lassiter T; Kumar E
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2001; 72(2):20-5, 38. PubMed ID: 11484611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulated-use evaluation of a strategy for preventing biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines.
    McDowell JW; Paulson DS; Mitchell JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jun; 135(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 15270166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of iodine in microbial control of dental treatment water.
    Puttaiah R; Seibert J; Spears R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 22186807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiregional evaluation of the SimPlate heterotrophic plate count method compared to the standard plate count agar pour plate method in water.
    Jackson RW; Osborne K; Barnes G; Jolliff C; Zamani D; Roll B; Stillings A; Herzog D; Cannon S; Loveland S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 66(1):453-4. PubMed ID: 10618266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bactericidal effects of acidic electrolyzed water on the dental unit waterline.
    Kohno S; Kawata T; Kaku M; Fuita T; Tsutsui K; Ohtani J; Tenjo K; Motokawa M; Tohma Y; Shigekawa M; Kamata H; Tanne K
    Jpn J Infect Dis; 2004 Apr; 57(2):52-4. PubMed ID: 15118209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines.
    Epstein JB; Dawson JR; Buivids IA; Wong B; Le ND
    Spec Care Dentist; 2002; 22(4):137-41. PubMed ID: 12449456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the validity of two in-office water test kits.
    Bartoloni JA; Porteous NB; Zarzabal LA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Mar; 137(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 16570470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of in-office dental unit waterline testing.
    Momeni SS; Tomline N; Ruby JD; Dasanayake AP
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e142-7. PubMed ID: 22623469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A centralised, automated dental hospital water quality and biofilm management system using neutral Ecasol maintains dental unit waterline output at better than potable quality: a 2-year longitudinal study.
    O'Donnell MJ; Boyle M; Swan J; Russell RJ; Coleman DC
    J Dent; 2009 Oct; 37(10):748-62. PubMed ID: 19573971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.