These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24054895)

  • 1. Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter?
    Patterson JT; Carter MJ; Hansen S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 24054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-controlled knowledge of results: age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection.
    Carter MJ; Patterson JT
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1459-72. PubMed ID: 23164628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Smith V; Carlsen AN; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 28243728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 26892773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 20862778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the Preferred Self-Controlled KR Schedules of Learners and Peers During Motor Skill Learning.
    McRae M; Patterson JT; Hansen S
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 25893852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context.
    Patterson JT; Carter M; Sanli E
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Dec; 82(4):624-33. PubMed ID: 22276404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Average KR schedule in learning of timing: influence of length for summary knowledge of results and task complexity.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):911-24. PubMed ID: 16491697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill.
    Wishart LR; Lee TD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1107-22. PubMed ID: 9172230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback.
    Hansen S; Pfeiffer J; Patterson JT
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 21347953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External Control of Knowledge of Results: Learner Involvement Enhances Motor Skill Transfer.
    Figueiredo LS; Ugrinowitsch H; Freire AB; Shea JB; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Apr; 125(2):400-416. PubMed ID: 29350078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals.
    Patterson JT; Carter M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 20338655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 14766489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Win-shift, lose-stay: contingent switching and contextual interference in motor learning.
    Simon DA; Lee TD; Cullen JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):407-18. PubMed ID: 19093603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demonstrations and knowledge of results in motor skill acquisition.
    McCullagh P; Little WS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 1):735-42. PubMed ID: 2293176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of knowledge of results (KR) frequency in the learning of a timing skill: absolute versus relative KR frequency.
    Vieira MM; Ugrinowitsch H; Oliveira FS; Gallo LG; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):360-9. PubMed ID: 23265002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills.
    Porter JM; Magill RA
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Oct; 28(12):1277-85. PubMed ID: 20845219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-Controlled Feedback and Learner Impulsivity in Sequential Motor Learning.
    Ferreira BP; Malloy-Diniz LF; Parma JO; Nogueira NGHM; Apolinário-Souza T; Ugrinowitsch H; Lage GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2019 Feb; 126(1):157-179. PubMed ID: 30398959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing specificity and guidance hypotheses by manipulating relative frequency of KR scheduling in motor skill acquisition.
    Goodwin JE; Eckerson JM; Voll CA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Dec; 93(3):819-24. PubMed ID: 11806606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of frequency of feedback on the learning of motor skill in individuals with cerebral palsy.
    Hemayattalab R; Rostami LR
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(1):212-7. PubMed ID: 19864110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.