332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24055430)
21. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy.
Komai Y; Numao N; Yoshida S; Matsuoka Y; Nakanishi Y; Ishii C; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 23542406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prebiopsy multiparametric 3T prostate MRI in patients with elevated PSA, normal digital rectal examination, and no previous biopsy.
Jambor I; Kähkönen E; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Alanen K; Obsitnik B; Minn H; Lehotska V; Aronen HJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1394-404. PubMed ID: 24956412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Walton Diaz A; Shakir NA; George AK; Rais-Bahrami S; Turkbey B; Rothwax JT; Stamatakis L; Hong CW; Siddiqui MM; Okoro C; Raskolnikov D; Su D; Shih J; Han H; Parnes HL; Merino MJ; Simon RM; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2015 May; 33(5):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 25754621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.
Nafie S; Pal RP; Dormer JP; Khan MA
World J Urol; 2014 Aug; 32(4):971-5. PubMed ID: 24337167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Gelister J; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; Ramachandran N; van der Meulen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Br J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 116(9):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 28350785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.
Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Mones F; Westphalen AC; Mally D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6042-6051. PubMed ID: 32591887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What Burden of Prostate Cancer Can Radiologists Rule Out on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Sensitivity Analysis Based on Varying the Target Condition in Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies.
Anastasiadis E; Charman SC; Arumainayagam N; Sohaib AS; Allen C; Freeman A; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Urology; 2015 Sep; 86(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 26253041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers.
Volkin D; Turkbey B; Hoang AN; Rais-Bahrami S; Yerram N; Walton-Diaz A; Nix JW; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E43-E49. PubMed ID: 24712649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Efficacy of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Biopsy of the Prostate in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy.
Nafie S; Wanis M; Khan M
Urol J; 2017 Mar; 14(2):3008-3012. PubMed ID: 28299763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessing clinically significant prostate cancer: Diagnostic properties of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to three-dimensional transperineal template mapping histopathology.
Tsivian M; Gupta RT; Tsivian E; Qi P; Mendez MH; Abern MR; Tay KJ; Polascik TJ
Int J Urol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 27859637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study.
Rouse P; Shaw G; Ahmed HU; Freeman A; Allen C; Emberton M
Urol Int; 2011; 87(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 21701136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combined magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for prostate cancer detection.
Perdonà S; Di Lorenzo G; Autorino R; Buonerba C; De Sio M; Setola SV; Fusco R; Ronza FM; Caraglia M; Ferro M; Petrillo A
Urol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(6):761-5. PubMed ID: 21906966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
