These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24056240)

  • 1. Effect of distracter preexposure on the reset of an internal clock.
    Buhusi CV; Matthews AR
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():72-80. PubMed ID: 24056240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-sharing in rats: effect of distracter intensity and discriminability.
    Buhusi CV
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 22122061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time sharing in rats: A peak-interval procedure with gaps and distracters.
    Buhusi CV; Meck WH
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):107-15. PubMed ID: 16413701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal choline supplementation increases sensitivity to contextual processing of temporal information.
    Buhusi CV; Lamoureux JA; Meck WH
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1237():204-13. PubMed ID: 18778696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase resetting and its implications for interval timing with intruders.
    Oprisan SA; Dix S; Buhusi CV
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():146-53. PubMed ID: 24113026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interval timing with gaps and distracters: evaluation of the ambiguity, switch, and time-sharing hypotheses.
    Buhusi CV; Meck WH
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16834500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of an intruded event on peak-interval timing in rats: isolation of a postcue effect.
    Brown BL; Richer P; Doyère V
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 17161921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of spontaneously hypertensive rats in a peak-interval procedure with gaps.
    Orduña V; García A; Menez M; Hong E; Bouzas A
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 191(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 18436313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing for the absence of a stimulus: the gap paradigm reversed.
    Buhusi CV; Meck WH
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Jul; 26(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 10913995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning to stop or reset the internal clock.
    Orduña V; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2011 Nov; 88(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 21907270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual complexity, rather than valence or arousal accounts for distracter-induced overproductions of temporal durations.
    Folta-Schoofs K; Wolf OT; Treue S; Schoofs D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():51-9. PubMed ID: 24161200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.
    Matell MS; Kim JS; Hartshorne L
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():49-57. PubMed ID: 24012783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do rats time filled and empty intervals of equal duration differently?
    Macinnis ML
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 17343993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. mPFC catecholamines modulate attentional capture by appetitive distracters and attention to time in a peak-interval procedure in rats.
    Buhusi CV; Matthews AR; Buhusi M
    Behav Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 136(5):418-429. PubMed ID: 35834191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in interval timing and attention to time in C57Bl/6J mice.
    Buhusi M; Bartlett MJ; Buhusi CV
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 May; 324():96-99. PubMed ID: 28212945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample discrimination of frequency differences with distracters.
    Neff DL; Odgaard EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3051-61. PubMed ID: 15603150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aberrant connections between climbing fibres and Purkinje cells induce alterations in the timing of an instrumental response in the rat.
    Gaytán-Tocavén L; López-Vázquez MÁ; Guevara MÁ; Olvera-Cortés ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2787-2796. PubMed ID: 28634887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel, associative process modulating photic resetting of the circadian clock.
    Arvanitogiannis A; Amir S
    Neuroscience; 2001; 104(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 11440794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential reinforcement of low rates differentially decreased timing precision.
    Eckard ML; Kyonka EGE
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jun; 151():111-118. PubMed ID: 29608943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.
    Matell MS; Portugal GS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 17023122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.