499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24057029)
41. Outcomes and Complications After Primary Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior Tears or Biceps Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Deng ZJ; Yin C; Cusano J; Abdul-Rassoul H; Curry EJ; Novikov D; Ma R; Li X
Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Aug; 8(8):2325967120945322. PubMed ID: 32923502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis of the Shoulder: Indications and Technique Options.
Nuelle CW; Sheean A; Tucker CJ
Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2352-2353. PubMed ID: 32325099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The low-anterolateral portal for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: description of technique and cadaveric study.
Knudsen ML; Hibbard JC; Nuckley DJ; Braman JP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Feb; 22(2):462-6. PubMed ID: 23400912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Surgical treatment for long head of the biceps tendinopathy: a network meta-analysis.
Anil U; Hurley ET; Kingery MT; Pauzenberger L; Mullett H; Strauss EJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 32037231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Arthroscopic versus open comparison of long head of biceps tendon visualization and pathology in patients requiring tenodesis.
Gilmer BB; DeMers AM; Guerrero D; Reid JB; Lubowitz JH; Guttmann D
Arthroscopy; 2015 Jan; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 25239173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The keyhole technique for arthroscopic tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. In vivo prospective study with a radio-opaque marker.
Kany J; Guinand R; Amaravathi RS; Alassaf I
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Feb; 101(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 25579826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis.
Mazzocca AD; Bicos J; Santangelo S; Romeo AA; Arciero RA
Arthroscopy; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1296-306. PubMed ID: 16325079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical outcome comparison of suprapectoral and subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps with concomitant rotator cuff repair: A systematic review.
Ergün S; Cırdı YU; Baykan SE; Akgün U; Karahan M
Shoulder Elbow; 2022 Feb; 14(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 35154394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Biomechanical comparison of two techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: interference screw versus implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation.
Sampatacos N; Getelman MH; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Nov; 23(11):1731-9. PubMed ID: 24810080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis.
Patel KV; Bravman J; Vidal A; Chrisman A; McCarty E
Clin Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 26614471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Anatomic limitations of biceps tenodesis using an interference screw for Asian people: a cadaveric study.
Umatani N; Arai R; Kuriyama S; Matsuda S
JSES Int; 2020 Sep; 4(3):422-426. PubMed ID: 32939462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Conversion of Failed Proximal Long Head of the Biceps Tenodesis to Distal Subpectoral Tenodesis: Outcomes in an Active Population.
Peebles LA; Midtgaard KS; Aman ZS; Douglass BW; Nolte PC; Millett PJ; Provencher CMT
Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2975-2981. PubMed ID: 32721542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?
Millett PJ; Sanders B; Gobezie R; Braun S; Warner JJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Sep; 9():121. PubMed ID: 18793424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
Provencher MT; LeClere LE; Romeo AA
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev; 2008 Sep; 16(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 18703977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Nair R; Kahlenberg CA; Patel RM; Knesek M; Terry MA
Arthrosc Tech; 2015 Dec; 4(6):e855-61. PubMed ID: 27284524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Surgical Management of Proximal Long Head Biceps Tendon Disorders.
Angelo RL
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev; 2018 Dec; 26(4):176-180. PubMed ID: 30395063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Immediate physical therapy without postoperative restrictions following open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low failure rates and improved outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Liechti DJ; Mitchell JJ; Menge TJ; Hackett TR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 29804912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
