These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24058699)

  • 1. Population ecology of free-roaming cats and interference competition by coyotes in urban parks.
    Gehrt SD; Wilson EC; Brown JL; Anchor C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75718. PubMed ID: 24058699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of urbanization on resource use and individual specialization in coyotes (Canis latrans) in southern California.
    Larson RN; Brown JL; Karels T; Riley SPD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228881. PubMed ID: 32023321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coexistence of coyotes (Canis latrans) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an urban landscape.
    Mueller MA; Drake D; Allen ML
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190971. PubMed ID: 29364916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial ecology of coyotes in the urbanizing landscape of the Cuyahoga Valley, Ohio.
    Franckowiak GA; Perdicas M; Smith GA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227028. PubMed ID: 31887177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal relationships of coyotes and free-ranging domestic cats as indicators of conflict in Culver City, California.
    Davenport RN; Weaver M; Weiss KCB; Strauss EG
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14169. PubMed ID: 36225908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infection risk varies within urbanized landscapes: the case of coyotes and heartworm.
    Worsley-Tonks KEL; Gehrt SD; Anchor C; Escobar LE; Craft ME
    Parasit Vectors; 2021 Sep; 14(1):464. PubMed ID: 34503566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Hinton JW; van Manen FT; Chamberlain MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132203. PubMed ID: 26148130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiscale assessment of habitat selection and avoidance of sympatric carnivores by the endangered ocelot.
    Sergeyev M; Cherry MJ; Tanner EP; Lombardi JV; Tewes ME; Campbell TA
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):8882. PubMed ID: 37264027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recolonizing wolves and mesopredator suppression of coyotes: impacts on pronghorn population dynamics.
    Berger KM; Conner MM
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 18488620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
    Berger KM; Gese EM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1075-85. PubMed ID: 17922704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual variation in anthropogenic resource use in an urban carnivore.
    Newsome SD; Garbe HM; Wilson EC; Gehrt SD
    Oecologia; 2015 May; 178(1):115-28. PubMed ID: 25669449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urban landscape and infection risk in free-roaming cats.
    Candela MG; Fanelli A; Carvalho J; Serrano E; Domenech G; Alonso F; Martínez-Carrasco C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2022 Jun; 69(4):295-311. PubMed ID: 35129882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA metabarcoding reveals that coyotes in New York City consume wide variety of native prey species and human food.
    Henger CS; Hargous E; Nagy CM; Weckel M; Wultsch C; Krampis K; Duncan N; Gormezano L; Munshi-South J
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13788. PubMed ID: 36164598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn.
    Berger KM; Gese EM; Berger J
    Ecology; 2008 Mar; 89(3):818-28. PubMed ID: 18459344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Ward JN; Hinton JW; Johannsen KL; Karlin ML; Miller KV; Chamberlain MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203703. PubMed ID: 30303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anthropogenic subsidies influence resource use during a mange epizootic in a desert coyote population.
    Reddell CD; Roemer GW; Delaney DK; Karish T; Cain JW
    Oecologia; 2023 Feb; 201(2):435-447. PubMed ID: 36746796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivores.
    Fedriani JM; Fuller TK; Sauvajot RM; York EC
    Oecologia; 2000 Oct; 125(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 24595837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes.
    Newsome TM; Ripple WJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24930631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landscape ecology of eastern coyotes based on large-scale estimates of abundance.
    Kays RW; Gompper ME; Ray JC
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Jun; 18(4):1014-27. PubMed ID: 18536259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do biological and bedsite characteristics influence survival of neonatal white-tailed deer?
    Chitwood MC; Lashley MA; Kilgo JC; Pollock KH; Moorman CE; DePerno CS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119070. PubMed ID: 25734333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.