These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24059046)

  • 1. [Research on video measuring method of knee joint angle based on cross ratio invariability].
    An M; Chen Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 30(4):733-6. PubMed ID: 24059046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observational ratings of frontal plane knee position are related to the frontal plane projection angle but not the knee abduction angle during a step-down task.
    Jones D; Tillman SM; Tofte K; Mizner RL; Greenberg S; Moser MW; Chmielewski TL
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Dec; 44(12):973-8. PubMed ID: 25366084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambulatory measurement of 3D knee joint angle.
    Favre J; Jolles BM; Aissaoui R; Aminian K
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1029-35. PubMed ID: 18222459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a new method for finding the rotational axes of the knee using both marker-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and 3D video-based motion analysis for kinematic measurements.
    Roland M; Hull ML; Howell SM
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 May; 133(5):051003. PubMed ID: 21599094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An automated image-based method of 3D subject-specific body segment parameter estimation for kinetic analyses of rapid movements.
    Sheets AL; Corazza S; Andriacchi TP
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jan; 132(1):011004. PubMed ID: 20524742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent validity and reliability of two-dimensional video analysis of hip and knee joint motion during mechanical lifting.
    Norris BS; Olson SL
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2011 Oct; 27(7):521-30. PubMed ID: 21568816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional knee axis based on isokinetic dynamometry data: Comparison of two methods, MRI validation, and effect on knee joint kinematics.
    Van Campen A; De Groote F; Bosmans L; Scheys L; Jonkers I; De Schutter J
    J Biomech; 2011 Oct; 44(15):2595-600. PubMed ID: 21924426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy verification of the photostereometric system KKN/1B developed for intraoperative measurement of knee movement immediately after total knee arthroplasty.
    Nishino K; Hayashi T; Suzuki Y; Koga Y; Omori G
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1999; 9(4):261-73. PubMed ID: 10718664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional calibration procedure for 3D knee joint angle description using inertial sensors.
    Favre J; Aissaoui R; Jolles BM; de Guise JA; Aminian K
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2330-5. PubMed ID: 19665712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of the 3D relative movement of external marker sets vs. bones based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sangeux M; Marin F; Charleux F; Dürselen L; Ho Ba Tho MC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):984-91. PubMed ID: 16844273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual axis finder: a new method to determine the two kinematic axes of rotation for the tibio-femoral joint.
    Roland M; Hull ML; Howell SM
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jan; 132(1):011009. PubMed ID: 20524747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint and knee braces].
    Thomsen M; Mannel H; Spiering S; Dathe H; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
    Orthopade; 2002 Sep; 31(9):914-20. PubMed ID: 12232711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A numerical investigation on the variation in hip injury tolerance with occupant posture during frontal collisions.
    Yue N; Untaroiu CD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(5):513-22. PubMed ID: 24678575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Significance of 3 dimensional motion of the femurotibial joint for design of knee support orthoses].
    Wetz HH; Jacob HA
    Orthopade; 2001 Apr; 30(4):196-207. PubMed ID: 11357439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of knee flexion/extension angle using wearable UWB radios.
    Qi Y; Soh CB; Gunawan E; Low KS; Maskooki A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7213-6. PubMed ID: 24111409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of trunk flexion on hip and knee joint kinematics during a controlled drop landing.
    Blackburn JT; Padua DA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 18037546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and validation of a general purpose robotic testing system for musculoskeletal applications.
    Noble LD; Colbrunn RW; Lee DG; van den Bogert AJ; Davis BL
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):025001. PubMed ID: 20370251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of nonballistic active knee extension in neural slump position and static stretch techniques on hamstring flexibility.
    Webright WG; Randolph BJ; Perrin DH
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1997 Jul; 26(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 9201636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of static stretching of quadriceps and hamstring muscles on knee joint position sense.
    Larsen R; Lund H; Christensen R; Røgind H; Danneskiold-Samsøe B; Bliddal H
    Br J Sports Med; 2005 Jan; 39(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 15618341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of knee gait kinematics of workers exposed to knee straining posture to those of non-knee straining workers.
    Gaudreault N; Hagemeister N; Poitras S; de Guise JA
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 23206900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.