These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24059375)

  • 1. Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting.
    Gunn AJ; Alabre CI; Bennett SE; Kautzky M; Krakower T; Palamara K; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 24059375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The state of structured reporting: the nuance of standardized language.
    Shea LAG; Towbin AJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):500-508. PubMed ID: 30923882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent measures to improve radiology reporting: perspectives from primary care physicians.
    Gunn AJ; Sahani DV; Bennett SE; Choy G
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Feb; 10(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 23228373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians.
    Clinger NJ; Hunter TB; Hillman BJ
    Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):825-6. PubMed ID: 3187005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiology by nonradiologists: is report documentation adequate?
    Weiner SN
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Dec; 11(12):781-5. PubMed ID: 16336062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review in cardiothoracic radiology.
    Kanne JP
    J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Sep; 29(5):270-6; quiz 277-8. PubMed ID: 25160595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using informatics-enabled quality improvement techniques to meet health record documentation requirements in radiology reports.
    Prevedello LM; Farkas C; Dufault A; Damiano M; Doubilet P; Khorasani R
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 23830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The exam request seen by the radiologist, the report seen by the clinician].
    Dacher JN; Lechevallier J
    J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 80(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 10470615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
    Strickland NH
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. JOURNAL CLUB: Structured Feedback From Patients on Actual Radiology Reports: A Novel Approach to Improve Reporting Practices.
    Gunn AJ; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Mangano MD; Sahani DV; Boland GW; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1262-1270. PubMed ID: 28402133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Template-driven computed tomography radiation dose reporting: implementation of a radiology housestaff quality improvement project.
    Yu JP; Kansagra AP; Naeger DM; Gould RG; Coakley FV
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):769-72. PubMed ID: 23664402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of radiologists in reducing diagnostic error in health care.
    Allen B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1101-2. PubMed ID: 25467720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.
    Larson DB; Towbin AJ; Pryor RM; Donnelly LF
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 23329657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking the role of the radiologist: enhancing visibility through both traditional and nontraditional reporting practices.
    Gunn AJ; Mangano MD; Choy G; Sahani DV
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 25763726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value.
    Sadigh G; Hertweck T; Kao C; Wood P; Hughes D; Henry TS; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 May; 12(5):519-24. PubMed ID: 25622764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center.
    Nayak L; Beaulieu CF; Rubin DL; Lipson JA
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1577-83. PubMed ID: 24200485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.
    Johnson AJ; Ying J; Swan JS; Williams LS; Applegate KE; Littenberg B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 17411639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Access to Radiology Reports via an Online Patient Portal: Experiences of Referring Physicians and Patients.
    Henshaw D; Okawa G; Ching K; Garrido T; Qian H; Tsai J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):582-6.e1. PubMed ID: 26047399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologists' role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients.
    Mangano MD; Rahman A; Choy G; Sahani DV; Boland GW; Gunn AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):1034-9. PubMed ID: 25341142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.