BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24059400)

  • 21. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²).
    Kitajima K; Takahashi S; Ueno Y; Yoshikawa T; Ohno Y; Obara M; Miyake H; Fujisawa M; Sugimura K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 22371381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
    Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
    Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prostate cancer: computer-aided diagnosis with multiparametric 3-T MR imaging--effect on observer performance.
    Hambrock T; Vos PC; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO; Huisman HJ
    Radiology; 2013 Feb; 266(2):521-30. PubMed ID: 23204542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade.
    Tamada T; Sone T; Jo Y; Toshimitsu S; Yamashita T; Yamamoto A; Tanimoto D; Ito K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 18777532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between T2 relaxation and apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant and non-malignant prostate regions and the effect of peripheral zone fractional volume.
    Simpkin CJ; Morgan VA; Giles SL; Riches SF; Parker C; deSouza NM
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 86(1024):20120469. PubMed ID: 23426849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate].
    Röthke M; Blondin D; Schlemmer HP; Franiel T
    Rofo; 2013 Mar; 185(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 23404430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
    Vos EK; Kobus T; Litjens GJ; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO; Maas MC; Scheenen TW
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):490-7. PubMed ID: 25867656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer.
    Shinmoto H; Oshio K; Tanimoto A; Higuchi N; Okuda S; Kuribayashi S; Mulkern RV
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 18768281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
    Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interobserver agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 lexicon among radiologists with different levels of experience.
    Mussi TC; Yamauchi FI; Tridente CF; Tachibana A; Tonso VM; Recchimuzzi DZ; Leão LRS; Luz DC; Martins T; Baroni RH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 51(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 31369194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer.
    Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Haas M; Cash H; Miller K; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Kaufmann D; Rotzinger R; Lee CH; Asbach P; Hamm B; Penzkofer T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4262-4271. PubMed ID: 32219507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
    Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Chandarana H; Gilet A; Deng FM; Babb JS; Melamed J; Taneja SS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 23238968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results.
    Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):842-7. PubMed ID: 18007156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Becker AS; Cornelius A; Reiner CS; Stocker D; Ulbrich EJ; Barth BK; Mortezavi A; Eberli D; Donati OF
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():58-63. PubMed ID: 28941761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.
    Byun J; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):577-586. PubMed ID: 32045072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting.
    Grey AD; Chana MS; Popert R; Wolfe K; Liyanage SH; Acher PL
    BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 25041307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Hoeks CM; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Roobol MJ; Bul M; Hambrock T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 24220253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.