These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24059446)

  • 1. Predictive performance of comorbidity measures in administrative databases for diabetes cohorts.
    Lix LM; Quail J; Fadahunsi O; Teare GF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 13():340. PubMed ID: 24059446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of comorbidity measures for predicting outcomes in population-based osteoporosis cohorts.
    Lix LM; Quail J; Teare G; Acan B
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Oct; 22(10):2633-43. PubMed ID: 21305268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
    Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing comorbidity measures for predicting mortality and hospitalization in three population-based cohorts.
    Quail JM; Lix LM; Osman BA; Teare GF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Jun; 11():146. PubMed ID: 21663672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
    Zhu H; Hill MD
    Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concordance between administrative health data and medical records for diabetes status in coronary heart disease patients: a retrospective linked data study.
    Nedkoff L; Knuiman M; Hung J; Sanfilippo FM; Katzenellenbogen JM; Briffa TG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():121. PubMed ID: 24079345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different comorbidity measures for use with administrative data in predicting short- and long-term mortality.
    Chu YT; Ng YY; Wu SC
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():140. PubMed ID: 20507593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
    Quan H; Sundararajan V; Halfon P; Fong A; Burnand B; Luthi JC; Saunders LD; Beck CA; Feasby TE; Ghali WA
    Med Care; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16224307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.
    Southern DA; Quan H; Ghali WA
    Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 15076812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.
    Simard M; Sirois C; Candas B
    Med Care; 2018 May; 56(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 29578951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorized diagnoses and procedure records in an administrative database improved mortality prediction.
    Yamana H; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1028-35. PubMed ID: 25596112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Performance of Comorbidity Measures in Predicting Health Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Zhan ZW; Chen YA; Dong YH
    Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2020; 15():335-344. PubMed ID: 32103932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A disease-specific comorbidity index for predicting mortality in patients admitted to hospital with a cardiac condition.
    Azzalini L; Chabot-Blanchet M; Southern DA; Nozza A; Wilton SB; Graham MM; Gravel GM; Bluteau JP; Rouleau JL; Guertin MC; Jolicoeur EM
    CMAJ; 2019 Mar; 191(11):E299-E307. PubMed ID: 30885968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the performance of the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity measures across five European countries and three conditions.
    Gutacker N; Bloor K; Cookson R
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 25 Suppl 1():15-20. PubMed ID: 25690125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation and Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Score for ICD-10-CM.
    Sun JW; Rogers JR; Her Q; Welch EC; Panozzo CA; Toh S; Gagne JJ
    Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 29087983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.
    Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():62-69. PubMed ID: 27101889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
    Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comorbidity network for chronic disease: A novel approach to understand type 2 diabetes progression.
    Khan A; Uddin S; Srinivasan U
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jul; 115():1-9. PubMed ID: 29779710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative ability of comorbidity classification methods for administrative data to predict outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Austin PC; Stanbrook MB; Anderson GM; Newman A; Gershon AS
    Ann Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 22(12):881-7. PubMed ID: 23121992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.
    Bottle A; Aylin P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1426-33. PubMed ID: 21764557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.