361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24059944)
1. Comparative effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferons or glatiramer acetate for relapse rates in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis.
Bergvall N; Makin C; Lahoz R; Agashivala N; Pradhan A; Capkun G; Petrilla A; Karkare SU; Balderston McGuiness C; Korn JR
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1647-56. PubMed ID: 24059944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis switching from interferon to fingolimod or glatiramer acetate: a US claims database study.
Bergvall N; Makin C; Lahoz R; Agashivala N; Pradhan A; Capkun G; Petrilla AA; Karkare SU; McGuiness CB; Korn JR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88472. PubMed ID: 24516663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis.
Bergvall N; Petrilla AA; Karkare SU; Lahoz R; Agashivala N; Pradhan A; Capkun G; Makin C; McGuiness CB; Korn JR
J Med Econ; 2014 Oct; 17(10):696-707. PubMed ID: 25019581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Healthcare resource use and relapses with fingolimod versus natalizumab for treating multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis.
Bergvall N; Lahoz R; Reynolds T; Korn JR
Curr Med Res Opin; 2014 Aug; 30(8):1461-71. PubMed ID: 24754349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of switch to fingolimod or interferon beta/glatiramer acetate in active multiple sclerosis.
He A; Spelman T; Jokubaitis V; Havrdova E; Horakova D; Trojano M; Lugaresi A; Izquierdo G; Grammond P; Duquette P; Girard M; Pucci E; Iuliano G; Alroughani R; Oreja-Guevara C; Fernandez-Bolaños R; Grand'Maison F; Sola P; Spitaleri D; Granella F; Terzi M; Lechner-Scott J; Van Pesch V; Hupperts R; Sánchez-Menoyo JL; Hodgkinson S; Rozsa C; Verheul F; Butzkueven H; Kalincik T;
JAMA Neurol; 2015 Apr; 72(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 25665031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of early initiation of fingolimod versus delayed initiation after 1 year of intramuscular interferon beta-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Agashivala N; Kim E
Clin Ther; 2012 Jul; 34(7):1583-90. PubMed ID: 22749258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a for intramuscular administration: a study of outcomes among multiple sclerosis intent-to-treat and persistent-use cohorts.
Castelli-Haley J; Oleen-Burkey MA; Lage MJ; Johnson K
J Med Econ; 2010; 13(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 20662760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Kalincik T; Horakova D; Spelman T; Jokubaitis V; Trojano M; Lugaresi A; Izquierdo G; Rozsa C; Grammond P; Alroughani R; Duquette P; Girard M; Pucci E; Lechner-Scott J; Slee M; Fernandez-Bolanos R; Grand'Maison F; Hupperts R; Verheul F; Hodgkinson S; Oreja-Guevara C; Spitaleri D; Barnett M; Terzi M; Bergamaschi R; McCombe P; Sanchez-Menoyo J; Simo M; Csepany T; Rum G; Boz C; Havrdova E; Butzkueven H;
Ann Neurol; 2015 Mar; 77(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 25546031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-world durability of relapse rate reduction in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving fingolimod for up to 3 years: a retrospective US claims database analysis.
Fox E; Vieira MC; Johnson K; Peeples M; Bensimon AG; Signorovitch J; Herrera V
J Neurol Sci; 2019 Mar; 398():163-170. PubMed ID: 30731303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relapse and disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: subgroup analyses of the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled FREEDOMS study.
Devonshire V; Havrdova E; Radue EW; O'Connor P; Zhang-Auberson L; Agoropoulou C; Häring DA; Francis G; Kappos L;
Lancet Neurol; 2012 May; 11(5):420-8. PubMed ID: 22494956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab versus fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis.
O'Day K; Meyer K; Miller RM; Agarwal S; Franklin M
J Med Econ; 2011; 14(5):617-27. PubMed ID: 21777161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of real-world adherence on cost-effectiveness analysis in multiple sclerosis.
Brandes DW; Raimundo K; Agashivala N; Kim E
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 23391123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Annualized relapse rate of first-line treatments for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis, including indirect comparisons versus fingolimod.
Roskell NS; Zimovetz EA; Rycroft CE; Eckert BJ; Tyas DA
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 May; 28(5):767-80. PubMed ID: 22462530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-world propensity score comparison of treatment effectiveness of peginterferon beta-1a vs. subcutaneous interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, and teriflunomide in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Reder AT; Arndt N; Roman C; Geremakis C; Mendoza JP; Su R; Makin C; Avila RL; Vignos MC
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2021 Jun; 51():102935. PubMed ID: 33882426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis.
Iaffaldano P; Lucisano G; Pozzilli C; Brescia Morra V; Ghezzi A; Millefiorini E; Patti F; Lugaresi A; Zimatore GB; Marrosu MG; Amato MP; Bertolotto A; Bergamaschi R; Granella F; Coniglio G; Tedeschi G; Sola P; Lus G; Ferrò MT; Iuliano G; Corea F; Protti A; Cavalla P; Guareschi A; Rodegher M; Paolicelli D; Tortorella C; Lepore V; Prosperini L; Saccà F; Baroncini D; Comi G; Trojano M;
Brain; 2015 Nov; 138(Pt 11):3275-86. PubMed ID: 26362907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Kappos L; Radue EW; O'Connor P; Polman C; Hohlfeld R; Calabresi P; Selmaj K; Agoropoulou C; Leyk M; Zhang-Auberson L; Burtin P;
N Engl J Med; 2010 Feb; 362(5):387-401. PubMed ID: 20089952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glatiramer acetate versus interferon beta-1a for subcutaneous administration: comparison of outcomes among multiple sclerosis patients.
Castelli-Haley J; Oleen-Burkey M; Lage MJ; Johnson KP
Adv Ther; 2008 Jul; 25(7):658-73. PubMed ID: 18641926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US.
Ontaneda D; Nicholas J; Carraro M; Zhou J; Hou Q; Babb J; Riester K; Mendoza JP; Livingston T; Jhaveri M
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2019 Jan; 27():101-111. PubMed ID: 30368221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.
Lee S; Baxter DC; Limone B; Roberts MS; Coleman CI
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(6):1088-96. PubMed ID: 22583065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral fingolimod for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.
Singer B; Ross AP; Tobias K
Int J Clin Pract; 2011 Aug; 65(8):887-95. PubMed ID: 21679286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
