245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24060135)
1. A user's guide to quantitative and comparative analysis of metagenomic datasets.
Luo C; Rodriguez-R LM; Konstantinidis KT
Methods Enzymol; 2013; 531():525-47. PubMed ID: 24060135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of metagenomic sequences: methods and challenges.
Mande SS; Mohammed MH; Ghosh TS
Brief Bioinform; 2012 Nov; 13(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 22962338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MG-RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function.
Keegan KP; Glass EM; Meyer F
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():207-33. PubMed ID: 26791506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities.
Parks DH; Beiko RG
Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 20130030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ConStrains identifies microbial strains in metagenomic datasets.
Luo C; Knight R; Siljander H; Knip M; Xavier RJ; Gevers D
Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1045-52. PubMed ID: 26344404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MetaSAMS--a novel software platform for taxonomic classification, functional annotation and comparative analysis of metagenome datasets.
Zakrzewski M; Bekel T; Ander C; Pühler A; Rupp O; Stoye J; Schlüter A; Goesmann A
J Biotechnol; 2013 Aug; 167(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 23026555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An ORFome assembly approach to metagenomics sequences analysis.
Ye Y; Tang H
Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2008; 7():3-13. PubMed ID: 19642264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonpareil: a redundancy-based approach to assess the level of coverage in metagenomic datasets.
Rodriguez-R LM; Konstantinidis KT
Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 24123672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MetaFast: fast reference-free graph-based comparison of shotgun metagenomic data.
Ulyantsev VI; Kazakov SV; Dubinkina VB; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(18):2760-7. PubMed ID: 27259541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of simulated data sets to evaluate the fidelity of metagenomic processing methods.
Mavromatis K; Ivanova N; Barry K; Shapiro H; Goltsman E; McHardy AC; Rigoutsos I; Salamov A; Korzeniewski F; Land M; Lapidus A; Grigoriev I; Richardson P; Hugenholtz P; Kyrpides NC
Nat Methods; 2007 Jun; 4(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 17468765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference databases for taxonomic assignment in metagenomics.
Santamaria M; Fosso B; Consiglio A; De Caro G; Grillo G; Licciulli F; Liuni S; Marzano M; Alonso-Alemany D; Valiente G; Pesole G
Brief Bioinform; 2012 Nov; 13(6):682-95. PubMed ID: 22786784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metagenomic marine nitrogen fixation--feast or famine?
Johnston AW; Li Y; Ogilvie L
Trends Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 13(9):416-20. PubMed ID: 16043354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of whole genome shotgun metagenomics: a practical guide for the microbiome-minded physician scientist.
Ma J; Prince A; Aagaard KM
Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Jan; 32(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24390915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Community-analyzer: a platform for visualizing and comparing microbial community structure across microbiomes.
Kuntal BK; Ghosh TS; Mande SS
Genomics; 2013 Oct; 102(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 23978768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MetLab: An In Silico Experimental Design, Simulation and Analysis Tool for Viral Metagenomics Studies.
Norling M; Karlsson-Lindsjö OE; Gourlé H; Bongcam-Rudloff E; Hayer J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160334. PubMed ID: 27479078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
Zhang Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A metagenomics portal for a democratized sequencing world.
Wilke A; Glass EM; Bartels D; Bischof J; Braithwaite D; D'Souza M; Gerlach W; Harrison T; Keegan K; Matthews H; Kottmann R; Paczian T; Tang W; Trimble WL; Yilmaz P; Wilkening J; Desai N; Meyer F
Methods Enzymol; 2013; 531():487-523. PubMed ID: 24060134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial functional difference between microbial communities caused by length difference of sequencing reads.
Zhang Q; Doak TG; Ye Y
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2012; ():259-70. PubMed ID: 22174281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ORFome assembly approach to metagenomics sequences analysis.
Ye Y; Tang H
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Jun; 7(3):455-71. PubMed ID: 19507285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
