228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24060210)
1. Assessing the reproducibility of the IOTA simple ultrasound rules for classifying adnexal masses as benign or malignant using stored 3D volumes.
Guerriero S; Saba L; Ajossa S; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 24060210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses.
Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional volume off-line analysis as compared to real-time ultrasound for assessing adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Iturra A; Sedda F; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 22197306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement in assigning IOTA color score to adnexal masses using three-dimensional volumes or digital videoclips: potential implications for training.
Pineda L; Salcedo E; Vilhena C; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 44(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 24816975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment of adnexal masses: a reproducibility study.
Alcázar JL; García-Manero M; Galván R
J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Aug; 26(8):1007-11. PubMed ID: 17646362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of two different methods for vascular sampling by three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in solid and cystic-solid adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Prka M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 19199281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MÁ; Olartecoechea B; Graupera B; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Hereter L; Julve R; Gastón B; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Saba L; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 23576304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IOTA Simple Rules in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Non-expert Examiners.
Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3835-8. PubMed ID: 25987045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of adnexal masses: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of videos, using IOTA terminology.
Massobrio R; Mariani LL; Conti D; De Grandis T; Buonomo F; Badellino E; Novara L; Bounous VE; Perotto S; Mancarella M; Ferrero A; Biglia N; Fuso L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 309(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 37789207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Reproducibility of Ultrasonographic Findings of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis Among Examiners With Different Level of Expertise.
Guerriero S; Pascual M; Ajossa S; Neri M; Pilloni M; Graupera B; Rodriguez I; Alcazar JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):403-408. PubMed ID: 33837976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
