These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24060495)

  • 1. The variability of the volume of os coxae and linear pelvic morphometry. Considerations for total hip arthroplasty.
    Solomon LB; Howie DW; Henneberg M
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 24060495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-sectional anatomy of the ilium: implications for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Antoniades J; Pellegrini VD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3537-41. PubMed ID: 22965260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acetabular orientation with different pelvic registration landmarks.
    Mihalko WM; Kammerzell S; Saleh KJ
    Orthopedics; 2009 Oct; 32(10 Suppl):11-3. PubMed ID: 19835300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Anatomic and radiologic observations on the general architecture of the spongy substance of the human os coxae].
    Sciascia R
    Ann Ital Chir; 1967 Dec; 43(6):1087-109. PubMed ID: 4901151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shape variability of the adult human acetabulum and acetabular fossa related to sex and age by geometric morphometrics. Implications for adult age estimation.
    San-Millán M; Rissech C; Turbón D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Mar; 272():50-63. PubMed ID: 28113134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of cementless acetabular component in revision surgery without pelvic discontinuity.
    Cherubino P; D'Angelo F; Surace MF; Murena L; Vulcano E
    Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():315-20. PubMed ID: 21082580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is transverse acetabular ligament an anatomical landmark to reliably orient the cup in primary total hip arthroplasty?
    Viste A; Chouteau J; Testa R; Chèze L; Fessy MH; Moyen B
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 May; 97(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21277848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlations of total pelvic spongiosa volume with both anthropometric parameters and computed tomography-based skeletal size measurements.
    Brindle JM; Myers SL; Bolch WE
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2006 Aug; 21(4):352-63. PubMed ID: 16999601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distances between bony landmarks and adjacent nerves: anatomical factors that may influence retractor placement in total hip replacement surgery.
    Wang TI; Chen HY; Tsai CH; Hsu HC; Lin TL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Mar; 11():31. PubMed ID: 26984637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Resection and reconstruction for tumor of pelvic ring].
    Chen Q; Jin D; Shi Z; Jing Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 18361241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity.
    Issack PS; Nousiainen M; Beksac B; Helfet DL; Sculco TP; Buly RL
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Nov; 38(11):550-6. PubMed ID: 20049349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
    Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of the pelvic bone on the computational results of the acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis.
    Barreto S; Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Monteiro J
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 May; 132(5):054503. PubMed ID: 20459214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The frontal pelvic plane provides a valid reference system for implantation of the acetabular cup: spatial orientation of the pelvis in different positions.
    Mayr E; Kessler O; Prassl A; Rachbauer F; Krismer M; Nogler M
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):848-53. PubMed ID: 16470440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Girard J; Roy AG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 16877595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The angle-bore acetabular component and dislocation after revision of a failed total hip replacement.
    Wroblewski BM; Siney PD; Fleming PA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 16434521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Sotereanos NG; Miller MC; Smith B; Hube R; Sewecke JJ; Wohlrab D
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):832-40. PubMed ID: 16950035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and extra-articular planes of reference for use in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study.
    Hausselle J; Moreau PE; Wessely L; de Thomasson E; Assi A; Parratte S; Essig J; Skalli W
    Int Orthop; 2012 Aug; 36(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 22434132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of parity on pelvic size and shape dimorphism in Mus.
    Schutz H; Donovan ER; Hayes JP
    J Morphol; 2009 Jul; 270(7):834-42. PubMed ID: 19123249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.