BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24060548)

  • 1. Phasic boosting of auditory perception by visual emotion.
    Selinger L; Domínguez-Borràs J; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Dec; 94(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 24060548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-trial EEG-fMRI coupling of the emotional auditory early posterior negativity.
    Jaspers-Fayer F; Ertl M; Leicht G; Leupelt A; Mulert C
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1807-14. PubMed ID: 22584235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossmodal transfer of emotion by music.
    Logeswaran N; Bhattacharya J
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 May; 455(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 19368861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
    de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotionally negative pictures increase attention to a subsequent auditory stimulus.
    Tartar JL; de Almeida K; McIntosh RC; Rosselli M; Nash AJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 22015918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(6):1199-206. PubMed ID: 18783376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the effect of respiratory bodily threat on the processing of emotional pictures.
    Juravle G; Stoeckel MC; Rose M; Gamer M; Büchel C; Wieser MJ; von Leupoldt A
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2014 Dec; 204():41-9. PubMed ID: 24874555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectation decreases brain susceptibility to fearful stimuli: ERP evidence from a modified emotion evaluation task.
    Yang J; Yuan J; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 514(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 22426474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human amygdala response to unisensory and multisensory emotion input: No evidence for superadditivity from intracranial recordings.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Guex R; Méndez-Bértolo C; Legendre G; Spinelli L; Moratti S; Frühholz S; Mégevand P; Arnal L; Strange B; Seeck M; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():9-24. PubMed ID: 31158367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender related differences in visual and auditory processing of verbal and figural tasks.
    Jausovec N; Jausovec K
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():135-45. PubMed ID: 19747461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.
    Van der Molen MJ; Van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR; Hamel BC; Curfs LM; Ramakers GJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):720-9. PubMed ID: 21958658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of top-down processing in emotion perception: an ERP study of emotional faces in white noise versus noise-alone stimuli.
    Lee KY; Lee TH; Yoon SJ; Cho YS; Choi JS; Kim HT
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1337():56-63. PubMed ID: 20381474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual processing in a facial emotional context: an ERP study.
    González-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; López-Franco AL; Gómez-Velázquez FR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jan; 71(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18771695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.