These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24060644)
1. The electrophysiological locus of the redundant target effect on visual discrimination in a dual singleton search task. Akyürek EG; Schubö A Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():180-90. PubMed ID: 24060644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The allocation of attention in displays with simultaneously presented singletons. Akyürek EG; Schubö A Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 21406208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Grubert A; Krummenacher J; Eimer M J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search. Schubö A; Müller HJ Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli. Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanisms of the associated nontargets effect: processes influenced by statistical learning in a simple visual environment. Reynolds A; Miller J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):837-59. PubMed ID: 17514597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological correlates of detecting a visual target and detecting its absence: the role of feature dimensions. Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A; Müller HJ Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3365-70. PubMed ID: 20633570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological correlates of early attentional feature selection and distractor filtering. Akyürek EG; Schubö A Biol Psychol; 2013 May; 93(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 23454277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A; Schubö A J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological evidence for independent consolidation of multiple targets. Kihara K; Kawahara J; Takeda Y Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1493-6. PubMed ID: 18797304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]