These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24062499)

  • 1. Testing association with Fisher's Exact test.
    Warner P
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2013 Oct; 39(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 24062499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals that match Fisher's exact or Blaker's exact tests.
    Fay MP
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):373-4. PubMed ID: 19948745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stratified Fisher's exact test and its sample size calculation.
    Jung SH
    Biom J; 2014 Jan; 56(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 24395208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regarding Paper "Stratified Fisher's exact test and its sample size calculation".
    Martín-Andrés A; Herranz-Tejedor I
    Biom J; 2015 Sep; 57(5):930. PubMed ID: 26059610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exact test for detecting inconsistency in readers interpretation over time in screening mammograms.
    Lee JH; Eschrich S; Beam C
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 17638286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of Fisher's exact test to minor perturbations in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Dupont WD
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 3823670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An improved uniformly more powerful exact Fisher-Hayter pairwise comparisons procedure.
    Wang B; Cui X
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):767-775. PubMed ID: 28436123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fisher's inexact test: probability too serious to be left to statisticians.
    Cormack RS
    JAMA; 1989 Dec; 262(22):3129. PubMed ID: 2810664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for cubic smoothing splines under dependent data.
    Nummi T; Pan J; Siren T; Liu K
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 21210770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of continuous and discrete methods for combining probability values associated with matched-pairs t-test data.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):799-805. PubMed ID: 16060446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to data analysis.
    Adams V
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Aug; 49(8):375-6. PubMed ID: 18768074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Discrimination and interpretation of errors in statistical analysis of qualitative data in medical papers].
    Hu LP; Liu HG
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2007 Sep; 5(5):594-7. PubMed ID: 17854570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Discrimination and interpretation of errors in statistical analysis of quantitative data in medical papers].
    Hu LP; Liu HG
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2007 Jul; 5(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 17631820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on 'How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two-sample comparative binomial trial' by G. G. Crans and J. J. Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3598-3611.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 18825654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exact analysis of dose response for multiple correlated binary outcomes.
    Han KE; Catalano PJ; Senchaudhuri P; Mehta C
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 15032792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.