These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24062767)

  • 1. Computationally efficient permutation-based confidence interval estimation for tail-area FDR.
    Millstein J; Volfson D
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():179. PubMed ID: 24062767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Null-free False Discovery Rate Control Using Decoy Permutations.
    He K; Li MJ; Fu Y; Gong FZ; Sun XM
    Acta Math Appl Sin; 2022; 38(2):235-253. PubMed ID: 35431377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. fdrci: FDR confidence interval selection and adjustment for large-scale hypothesis testing.
    Millstein J; Battaglin F; Arai H; Zhang W; Jayachandran P; Soni S; Parikh AR; Mancao C; Lenz HJ
    Bioinform Adv; 2022; 2(1):vbac047. PubMed ID: 35747247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation.
    Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():303. PubMed ID: 18613966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
    Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of random-field-theory and false-discovery-rate inference results in the analysis of registered one-dimensional biomechanical datasets.
    Naouma H; Pataky TC
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8189. PubMed ID: 31844582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Permutation and parametric tests for effect sizes in voxel-based morphometry of gray matter volume in brain structural MRI.
    Dickie DA; Mikhael S; Job DE; Wardlaw JM; Laidlaw DH; Bastin ME
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 26253778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of false discovery rate using sequential permutation p-values.
    Bancroft T; Du C; Nettleton D
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23379645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
    Graf AC; Bauer P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups.
    Zhang J; Coombes KR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S1. PubMed ID: 23320794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Sarkar SK
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1544-1563. PubMed ID: 32367597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A direct approach to estimating false discovery rates conditional on covariates.
    Boca SM; Leek JT
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6035. PubMed ID: 30581661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of false discovery rates in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data.
    Tsai CA; Hsueh HM; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1071-81. PubMed ID: 14969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.