306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24063956)
41. Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle.
Pan H; Zhou Y; Izadnegahdar O; Cui J; Deng CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 15936500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Sonoporation-mediated transduction of siRNA ameliorated experimental arthritis using 3 MHz pulsed ultrasound.
Inoue H; Arai Y; Kishida T; Shin-Ya M; Terauchi R; Nakagawa S; Saito M; Tsuchida S; Inoue A; Shirai T; Fujiwara H; Mazda O; Kubo T
Ultrasonics; 2014 Mar; 54(3):874-81. PubMed ID: 24291002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability.
Lai CY; Wu CH; Chen CC; Li PC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 17169705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Nanodroplet-Vaporization-Assisted Sonoporation for Highly Effective Delivery of Photothermal Treatment.
Liu WW; Liu SW; Liou YR; Wu YH; Yang YC; Wang CR; Li PC
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24753. PubMed ID: 27094209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Adjustment of ultrasound exposure duration to microbubble sonodestruction kinetics for optimal cell sonoporation in vitro.
Tamosiūnas M; Jurkonis R; Mir LM; Lukosevicius A; Venslauskas MS; Satkauskas S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 11(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 22376133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Nanobubble-mediated cancer cell sonoporation using low-frequency ultrasound.
Bismuth M; Eck M; Ilovitsh T
Nanoscale; 2023 Nov; 15(44):17899-17909. PubMed ID: 37899700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Spatiotemporally controlled single cell sonoporation.
Fan Z; Liu H; Mayer M; Deng CX
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(41):16486-91. PubMed ID: 23012425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Mechanisms of Actin Cytoskeletal Re-modeling in Cells Perforated by Ultrasound-Driven Microbubbles.
Jia C; Shi J; Han T; Yu ACH; Qin P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 May; 48(5):760-777. PubMed ID: 35190224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Characterization of the dynamic activities of a population of microbubbles driven by pulsed ultrasound exposure in sonoporation.
Fan Z; Chen D; Deng CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1260-72. PubMed ID: 24486236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells.
Kudo N; Okada K; Yamamoto K
Biophys J; 2009 Jun; 96(12):4866-76. PubMed ID: 19527645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ultrasound-microbubble mediated cavitation of plant cells: effects on morphology and viability.
Qin P; Xu L; Zhong W; Yu AC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 38(6):1085-96. PubMed ID: 22502880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modeling electroporation in a single cell.
Krassowska W; Filev PD
Biophys J; 2007 Jan; 92(2):404-17. PubMed ID: 17056739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Investigating the Role of Lipid Transfer in Microbubble-Mediated Drug Delivery.
Aron M; Vince O; Gray M; Mannaris C; Stride E
Langmuir; 2019 Oct; 35(40):13205-13215. PubMed ID: 31517490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms.
Lentacker I; De Cock I; Deckers R; De Smedt SC; Moonen CT
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2014 Jun; 72():49-64. PubMed ID: 24270006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Landscape of Cellular Bioeffects Triggered by Ultrasound-Induced Sonoporation.
Przystupski D; Ussowicz M
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 36232532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Optimization of acoustic parameters of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound sonoporation for augmenting tumor cell permeability in vivo].
Luo L; Wu F; Wang B; Xu T; Hu J; Sui Y
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1377-81. PubMed ID: 24067224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Shear stress in cells generated by ultrasound.
Wu J
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2007; 93(1-3):363-73. PubMed ID: 16928394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Sonoporation generates downstream cellular impact after membrane resealing.
Duan X; Zhou Q; Wan JMF; Yu ACH
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5161. PubMed ID: 33664315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Fluid flow influences ultrasound-assisted endothelial membrane permeabilization and calcium flux.
Memari E; Hui F; Yusefi H; Helfield B
J Control Release; 2023 Jun; 358():333-344. PubMed ID: 37150403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells.
Forbes MM; Steinberg RL; O'Brien WD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2009-18. PubMed ID: 18692296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
