These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2406472)
1. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Dickersin K JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1385-9. PubMed ID: 2406472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors' role in avoiding it. Ekmekci PE Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Jun; 20(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 28342053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. Dickersin K AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Feb; 9(1 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 9083596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Dickersin K; Min YI Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():135-46; discussion 146-8. PubMed ID: 8192291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War. Polenakovic M; Danevska L Prilozi; 2011; 32(2):11-31. PubMed ID: 22286612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). Okike K; Kocher MS; Mehlman CT; Heckman JD; Bhandari M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 18310710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [La Medicina del Lavoro: 100 volumes]. Zocchetti C Med Lav; 2009; 100(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19263867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective. Shakiba B; Salmasian H; Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rohanizadegan M Arch Iran Med; 2008 May; 11(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 18426315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles. Pranić S; Marušić A J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts. Garfunkel JM; Ulshen MH; Hamrick HJ; Lawson EE JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1369-71. PubMed ID: 2304215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature. Sanossian N; Ohanian AG; Saver JL; Kim LI; Ovbiagele B Stroke; 2006 Oct; 37(10):2588-92. PubMed ID: 16931779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A century of editors. Riley RW JAMA; 1983 Jul; 250(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 6345816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. Lynch JR; Cunningham MR; Warme WJ; Schaad DC; Wolf FM; Leopold SS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 May; 89(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 17473138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Getting published well requires fulfilling editors' and reviewers' needs and desires. Schoenwolf GC Dev Growth Differ; 2013 Dec; 55(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 24131034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disclosure of duplicative studies: damned if you don't. Legro RS; Niederberger C; Pellicer A Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1347-9. PubMed ID: 23040529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ten questions you should consider before submitting an article to a scientific journal. Falcó-Pegueroles A; Rodríguez-Martín D Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018; 29(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 29329715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]