195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24065252)
1. Comparison of cervical lengths using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in midpregnancy.
Roh HJ; Ji YI; Jung CH; Jeon GH; Chun S; Cho HJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 24065252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation Between Cervical Lengths Measured by Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography for Predicting Preterm Birth.
Cho HJ; Roh HJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Mar; 35(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 26892824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short cervix detection in pregnant women by transabdominal sonography with post-void technique.
Kongwattanakul K; Saksiriwuttho P; Komwilaisak R; Lumbiganon P
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Oct; 43(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 27488965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of 3-dimensional power Doppler sonography in differentiating pregnant women with threatened preterm labor from those with an asymptomatic short cervix.
De Diego R; Sabrià J; Vela A; Rodríguez D; Gómez MD
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 24658947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks' gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches.
Marren AJ; Mogra R; Pedersen LH; Walter M; Ogle RF; Hyett JA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jun; 54(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 24702669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate.
Stamilio D; Carlson LM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):739-743.e1. PubMed ID: 27888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not transabdominal!
Khalifeh A; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):739-744.e1. PubMed ID: 27889000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement.
Peng CR; Chen CP; Wang KG; Wang LK; Chen CY; Chen YY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 54(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 25951722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth.
Crane JM; Hutchens D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 18816494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length in first and second trimesters in a low-risk population: a prospective study.
Wulff CB; Rode L; Rosthøj S; Hoseth E; Petersen OB; Tabor A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 51(5):604-613. PubMed ID: 28639717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?
Saul LL; Kurtzman JT; Hagemann C; Ghamsary M; Wing DA
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1305-11. PubMed ID: 18716140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length at 16-23 weeks of gestation.
Puttanavijarn L; Phupong V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 37(3):292-295. PubMed ID: 27750471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical length screening: a randomized trial assessing the impact on visit length and patient attitudes.
Romero ST; Holmgren CC; Feltovich H; Porter TF; Esplin MS
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2159-63. PubMed ID: 25425373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine second trimester cervical length screening in low risk women identified women at risk of a 'very' preterm birth but did not reduce the preterm birth rate: a randomised study from India.
Mishra S; Bagga R; Kalra J; Jain V; Dutta S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 38(6):789-795. PubMed ID: 29537316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Predictive value of cervical length by transvaginal sonography for preterm pregnancy during mid- and late-trimester of pregnancy].
Qu SH; Shi CY; Chen Q; Chen JY; Sun WJ; Sun Y; Zhang XX; Fan LX; Yang HX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 22321348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Introduction of a new index of cervical consistency with transvaginal B-mode ultrasonography.
M-Hyodo H; Hyodo H; Aisaka K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1320-2. PubMed ID: 23562024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can transabdominal ultrasound identify women at high risk for short cervical length?
Friedman AM; Schwartz N; Ludmir J; Parry S; Bastek JA; Sehdev HM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jun; 92(6):637-41. PubMed ID: 23590553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. It is about time. The advantage of transabdominal cervical length screening.
Ginsberg Y; Zipori Y; Khatib N; Schwake D; Goldstein I; Shrim A; Weiner Z; Beloosesky R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(24):4797-4802. PubMed ID: 33345666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
