These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24065284)

  • 1. Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Pick DF; Specker S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 24065284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observed bodies generate object-based spatial codes.
    Taylor A; Flynn M; Edmonds CJ; Gardner MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():71-8. PubMed ID: 27235754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced object-based perception in the near-hand space.
    Suh J; Abrams RA
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3403-12. PubMed ID: 26289483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.
    Fischer MH; Castel AD; Dodd MD; Pratt J
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 6(6):555-6. PubMed ID: 12754517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deconstructing Marilyn: robust effects of face contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Proctor RW; Pick DF
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Nov; 27(6):986-95. PubMed ID: 10586575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.
    Feria CS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):926-38. PubMed ID: 20436190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location.
    Schankin A; Valle-Inclán F; Hackley SA
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19521718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric exploration of the Simon effect across visual space.
    Klein RM; Dove ME; Ivanoff J; Eskes GA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 17133887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired spatial coding within objects but not between objects in prosopagnosia.
    Barton JJ; Cherkasova MV
    Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 16043798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1685-1705. PubMed ID: 32248290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From upright to upside-down presentation: a spatio-temporal ERP study of the parametric effect of rotation on face and house processing.
    Jemel B; Coutya J; Langer C; Roy S
    BMC Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 10():100. PubMed ID: 19691846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leftward deviation of eyes in human face drawing: a new diagnostic measure for left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Seki R; Ishiai S; Seki K; Okada T
    J Neurol Sci; 2010 Oct; 297(1-2):66-70. PubMed ID: 20656299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization.
    Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of attention in the affordance effect: can we afford to ignore it?
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S215-8. PubMed ID: 22806650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects.
    Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial compatibility and affordance compatibility in patients with chronic schizophrenia.
    Kume Y; Sato F; Hiraoka Y; Suzuki S; Niyama Y
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2016 Dec; 24():33-40. PubMed ID: 27931903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.