These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24065620)
21. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board. Anderson C Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Life After Research Misconduct. Galbraith KL J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries. Kaiser J Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct? Lubalin JS; Matheson JL Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):229-50. PubMed ID: 11657861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Research integrity. Ryan KJ Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 12569920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside. Youngner JS JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 9424047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The aftermath of the Gallo case. Anderson C Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo. Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint. Price AR J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI. Anderson C Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. ORI's self-assessment: a batting average of .920? Friedly J Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5304):1255. PubMed ID: 9064778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Scientific misconduct. HHS is still looking for a definition. Kaiser J Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1735. PubMed ID: 8650565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. NIH office plans research on misconduct. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]