These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24066109)
1. Can REDD+ help the conservation of restricted-range island species? Insights from the endemism hotspot of São Tomé. de Lima RF; Olmos F; Dallimer M; Atkinson PW; Barlow J PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74148. PubMed ID: 24066109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial patterns of carbon, biodiversity, deforestation threat, and REDD+ projects in Indonesia. Murray JP; Grenyer R; Wunder S; Raes N; Jones JP Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1434-45. PubMed ID: 25864538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Would protecting tropical forest fragments provide carbon and biodiversity cobenefits under REDD+? Magnago LF; Magrach A; Laurance WF; Martins SV; Meira-Neto JA; Simonelli M; Edwards DP Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Sep; 21(9):3455-68. PubMed ID: 25832015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Insectivorous bat activity dataset across different land-use types in the Islands of São Tomé and Príncipe, Central West Africa. Palmeirim AF; Araújo-Fernandes AC; Castro-Fernandes AS; Guedes P; Cassari J; Mata VA; Yoh N; Rocha R; Martínez-Arribas J; Alves-Martins F Biodivers Data J; 2024; 12():e131955. PubMed ID: 39281305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The collection of birds from São Tomé and Príncipe at the Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical of the University of Lisbon (Portugal). Monteiro M; Reino L; Melo M; Beja P; Bastos-Silveira C; Ramos M; Rodrigues D; Neves IQ; Consciência S; Figueira R Zookeys; 2016; (600):155-67. PubMed ID: 27408605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of restoring logged tropical forests on avian phylogenetic and functional diversity. Cosset CCP; Edwards DP Ecol Appl; 2017 Sep; 27(6):1932-1945. PubMed ID: 28543995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of areas in Brazil that optimize conservation of forest carbon, jaguars, and biodiversity. De Barros AE; MacDonald EA; Matsumoto MH; Paula RC; Nijhawan S; Malhi Y; MacDonald DW Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):580-93. PubMed ID: 24372997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Land use, REDD+ and the status of wildlife populations in Yaeda Valley, northern Tanzania. Kiffner C; Arndt Z; Foky T; Gaeth M; Gannett A; Jackson M; Lellman G; Love S; Maroldi A; McLaughlin S; Skenandore B; von Euler S; Zambrano Z; Kissui B PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214823. PubMed ID: 30947305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of forest carbon stocks for REDD+ implementation in the muyong forest system of Ifugao, Philippines. Avtar R; Tsusaka K; Herath S Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Aug; 192(9):571. PubMed ID: 32772191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Venter O; Laurance WF; Iwamura T; Wilson KA; Fuller RA; Possingham HP Science; 2009 Dec; 326(5958):1368. PubMed ID: 19965752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country. Roopsind A; Sohngen B; Brandt J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(49):24492-24499. PubMed ID: 31740591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds. Palomo I; Dujardin Y; Midler E; Robin M; Sanz MJ; Pascual U Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Nov; 116(45):22645-22650. PubMed ID: 31636201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of the impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their community forests in Nepal. Maraseni TN; Neupane PR; Lopez-Casero F; Cadman T J Environ Manage; 2014 Apr; 136():37-46. PubMed ID: 24561234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Secondary forest fragments offer important carbon and biodiversity cobenefits. Matos FAR; Magnago LFS; Aquila Chan Miranda C; de Menezes LFT; Gastauer M; Safar NVH; Schaefer CEGR; da Silva MP; Simonelli M; Edwards FA; Martins SV; Meira-Neto JAA; Edwards DP Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Feb; 26(2):509-522. PubMed ID: 31486174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries. Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix? Venter O; Koh LP Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2012 Feb; 1249():137-50. PubMed ID: 22168380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forest biodiversity monitoring for REDD+: a case study of actors' views in Peru. Entenmann SK; Kaphegyi TA; Schmitt CB Environ Manage; 2014 Feb; 53(2):300-17. PubMed ID: 24178126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing tree diversity and carbon storage during land use transitioning from shifting cultivation to indigenous agroforestry systems: Implications for REDD+ initiatives. Reang D; Hazarika A; Sileshi GW; Pandey R; Das AK; Nath AJ J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113470. PubMed ID: 34365182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The positive carbon stocks-biodiversity relationship in forests: co-occurrence and drivers across five subclimates. Lecina-Diaz J; Alvarez A; Regos A; Drapeau P; Paquette A; Messier C; Retana J Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1481-1493. PubMed ID: 29885260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]