811 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24066327)
1. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.
Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Bergé SJ; Xi T; Maal TJJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27887876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical accuracy of partially guided implant placement in edentulous patients: A computed tomography-based retrospective study.
Wang B; Yang J; Siow L; Wang Y; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Yu M; Wang H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 37814971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Navigation-Guided Dental Implant Placement with Screw Versus Hand Template Fixation in the Edentulous Mandible.
Kauffmann P; Rau A; Engelke W; Troeltzsch M; Brockmeyer P; Dagmar LS; Cordesmeyer R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):383-388. PubMed ID: 29534126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
