143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24066332)
1. The response of osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells to modified titanium surfaces.
Pivodova V; Frankova J; Dolezel P; Ulrichova J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1386-94. PubMed ID: 24066332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing biocompatibility of gingival fibroblasts and bacterial strains on a different modified titanium discs.
Franková J; Pivodová V; Růžička F; Tománková K; Šafářová K; Vrbková J; Ulrichová J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Oct; 101(10):2915-24. PubMed ID: 23529774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study.
Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sandblasted-acid-etched titanium surface influences in vitro the biological behavior of SaOS-2 human osteoblast-like cells.
Ramaglia L; Postiglione L; Di Spigna G; Capece G; Salzano S; Rossi G
Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 21422669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces.
An N; Rausch-fan X; Wieland M; Matejka M; Andrukhov O; Schedle A
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1207-14. PubMed ID: 23083807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies.
Hempel U; Hefti T; Kalbacova M; Wolf-Brandstetter C; Dieter P; Schlottig F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 19709059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Submicron scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces promote early osteogenic gene response for cell adhesion and cell differentiation.
Klein MO; Bijelic A; Ziebart T; Koch F; Kämmerer PW; Wieland M; Konerding MA; Al-Nawas B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 21682843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early cell response of osteogenic cells on differently modified implant surfaces: Sequences of cell proliferation, adherence and differentiation.
Blatt S; Pabst AM; Schiegnitz E; Hosang M; Ziebart T; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Klein MO
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 29325889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior.
Protivínský J; Appleford M; Strnad J; Helebrant A; Ong JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 17929514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability.
Velasco-Ortega E; Alfonso-Rodríguez CA; Monsalve-Guil L; España-López A; Jiménez-Guerra A; Garzón I; Alaminos M; Gil FJ
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jul; 64():1-10. PubMed ID: 27127022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Arachidonic acid and prostaglandin E2 influence human osteoblast (MG63) response to titanium surface roughness.
Dean DD; Campbell CM; Gruwell SF; Tindall JW; Chuang HH; Zhong W; Schmitz JP; Sylvia VL
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(6):303-12. PubMed ID: 19133484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study.
Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 in the metabolism and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells cultured on chemically modified titanium surfaces.
Cirano FR; Togashi AY; Marques MM; Pustiglioni FE; Lima LA
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 25506660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on osteoblast-like cells cultured on titanium and titanium-zirconium surfaces.
Atalay B; Aybar B; Ergüven M; Emes Y; Bultan Ö; Akça K; Yalçin S; Baysal U; Işsever H; Çehreli MC; Bilir A
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):2127-34. PubMed ID: 24220422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces.
Galli C; Guizzardi S; Passeri G; Martini D; Tinti A; Mauro G; Macaluso GM
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 15857069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavior of SaOS-2 cells cultured on different titanium surfaces.
Postiglione L; Di Domenico G; Ramaglia L; Montagnani S; Salzano S; Di Meglio F; Sbordone L; Vitale M; Rossi G
J Dent Res; 2003 Sep; 82(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 12939352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nano hydroxyapatite-blasted titanium surface affects pre-osteoblast morphology by modulating critical intracellular pathways.
Bezerra F; Ferreira MR; Fontes GN; da Costa Fernandes CJ; Andia DC; Cruz NC; da Silva RA; Zambuzzi WF
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2017 Aug; 114(8):1888-1898. PubMed ID: 28401535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of a nanoporous zirconia implant surface of on cell viability of human osteoblasts.
Aboushelib MN; Osman E; Jansen I; Everts V; Feilzer AJ
J Prosthodont; 2013 Apr; 22(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 23432766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation on SLA and hydrophilic modified SLA titanium surfaces.
Bang SM; Moon HJ; Kwon YD; Yoo JY; Pae A; Kwon IK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):831-7. PubMed ID: 23560589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
