BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24067688)

  • 21. Retraction of research findings.
    Lindberg DA
    Science; 1987 Mar; 235(4794):1308. PubMed ID: 3547649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The pain drug fraud scandal: implications for clinicians, investigators, and journals.
    Lipman AG
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 19670016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
    Beall J
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Departmental and institutional strategies for reducing fraud in clinical research.
    Sessler DI; Kurz A
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Aug; 115(2):474-6. PubMed ID: 22826524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
    Cohen P
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legitimate division of large data sets, salami slicing and dual publication, where does a fraud begin?
    Karlsson J; Beaufils P
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Apr; 21(4):751-2. PubMed ID: 23344120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
    Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
    Maturitas; 2009 Dec; 64(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 19954902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Paper retracted as co-author admits forgery.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):775. PubMed ID: 12594468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Research in anesthesia: fraud, police and professionalism].
    Donati F
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 23260629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nobel prizewinner's paper retracted.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):13. PubMed ID: 18322489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medical journal retracts paper over falsified data.
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):266. PubMed ID: 12124591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retraction notice.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):433-5. PubMed ID: 23538810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
    Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Notice of retraction.
    Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Mar; 348(10):945. PubMed ID: 12578957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.
    Kvaal SI
    J Am Coll Dent; 2008; 75(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 18777891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Editor's note: notices of retraction.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1246-7. PubMed ID: 21451077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.