These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Unpleasant surprises: how the Introduction has wandered into the Discussion. Wells WA J Cell Biol; 2006 Sep; 174(6):741. PubMed ID: 16954351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewers' Role in Research. Zareen N J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jul; 27(7):456. PubMed ID: 28818174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to review a paper for Heart. Otto CM Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Writing a constructive peer review: a young PI perspective. Belin D; Karadottir RT Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 44(11):2873-2876. PubMed ID: 27706862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How to write a perfect scientific manuscript. Rylski B Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Aug; 48(2):179. PubMed ID: 26069240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Writing up clinical research: a statistician's view. Vickers AJ J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Sep; 28(9):1127-9. PubMed ID: 23529711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The art and science of scientific writing. Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality articles require peer reviewers as well as authors. Mack A J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 Mar; 11(2):186. PubMed ID: 15766327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [On rejection of papers submitted for publication]. Bicas HE Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 16059554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective. Sohail S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Standardization of reviews of scientific publications]. Ventura AG Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):574-5; author reply 575. PubMed ID: 19839127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Writing an effective manuscript review: The 6 "Be's" to success. Annesley TM Clin Chem; 2013 Jul; 59(7):1028-35. PubMed ID: 23741073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Responsiveness in the review of scientific articles for publication]. Ventura AG Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):573; author reply 573. PubMed ID: 19820805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Your paper has been accepted for publication. Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How to write a medical paper to get it published in a good journal. Lundberg GD MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):36. PubMed ID: 16614658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers. Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]