These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24068246)
1. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature. Jager LR; Leek JT Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false. Ioannidis JP Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature. Goodman SN Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):23-7; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek. Benjamini Y; Hechtlinger Y Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-6; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature. Schuemie MJ; Ryan PB; Suchard MA; Shahn Z; Madigan D Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):36-9; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries. Marino MJ Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-values. Gelman A; O'Rourke K Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):18-23; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Discussion: Comment on a paper by Jager and Leek. Cox DR Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):16-8; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications. Verbitskaya EV Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating a positive false discovery rate for variable selection in pharmacogenetic studies. Li L; Hui S; Pennello G; Desta Z; Todd S; Nguyen A; Flockhart D J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(5):883-902. PubMed ID: 17885872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An analysis of trends in globalisation of origin of research published in major general medical journals. Falagas ME; Alexiou VG Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Jan; 62(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 18173813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data. Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate. Pounds S; Cheng C Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Investigation of the Variety and Complexity of Statistical Methods Used in Current Internal Medicine Literature. Narayanan R; Nugent R; Nugent K South Med J; 2015 Oct; 108(10):629-34. PubMed ID: 26437199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies. Wojcik J; Forner K Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple estimators of false discovery rates given as few as one or two p-values without strong parametric assumptions. Bickel DR Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):529-43. PubMed ID: 23798617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Problem of False Discovery: Many Scientific Results Can't Be Replicated, Leading to Serious Questions about What's True and False in the World of Research. Foster KR; Skufca J IEEE Pulse; 2016; 7(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 26978851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data. Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis. Liu P; Hwang JT Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]