These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24068246)

  • 1. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Jager LR; Leek JT
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false.
    Ioannidis JP
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Goodman SN
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):23-7; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek.
    Benjamini Y; Hechtlinger Y
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-6; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Schuemie MJ; Ryan PB; Suchard MA; Shahn Z; Madigan D
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):36-9; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-values.
    Gelman A; O'Rourke K
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):18-23; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discussion: Comment on a paper by Jager and Leek.
    Cox DR
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):16-8; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating a positive false discovery rate for variable selection in pharmacogenetic studies.
    Li L; Hui S; Pennello G; Desta Z; Todd S; Nguyen A; Flockhart D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(5):883-902. PubMed ID: 17885872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
    Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of trends in globalisation of origin of research published in major general medical journals.
    Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Jan; 62(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 18173813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Investigation of the Variety and Complexity of Statistical Methods Used in Current Internal Medicine Literature.
    Narayanan R; Nugent R; Nugent K
    South Med J; 2015 Oct; 108(10):629-34. PubMed ID: 26437199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies.
    Wojcik J; Forner K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simple estimators of false discovery rates given as few as one or two p-values without strong parametric assumptions.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):529-43. PubMed ID: 23798617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Problem of False Discovery: Many Scientific Results Can't Be Replicated, Leading to Serious Questions about What's True and False in the World of Research.
    Foster KR; Skufca J
    IEEE Pulse; 2016; 7(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 26978851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.