These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24068251)

  • 1. Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false.
    Ioannidis JP
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek.
    Benjamini Y; Hechtlinger Y
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-6; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Jager LR; Leek JT
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Goodman SN
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):23-7; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discussion: Comment on a paper by Jager and Leek.
    Cox DR
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):16-8; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Schuemie MJ; Ryan PB; Suchard MA; Shahn Z; Madigan D
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):36-9; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-values.
    Gelman A; O'Rourke K
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):18-23; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015.
    Chavalarias D; Wallach JD; Li AH; Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2016 Mar; 315(11):1141-8. PubMed ID: 26978209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
    Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status.
    Hall LM; Hendricks AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(1):564. PubMed ID: 33297936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments.
    Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect evidence of reporting biases was found in a survey of medical research studies.
    Albarqouni LN; López-López JA; Higgins JPT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():57-64. PubMed ID: 28088596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.