These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24068292)

  • 1. [Imaging monitors--requirements and pitfalls].
    Simmler R
    Radiologe; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1020-2. PubMed ID: 24068292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suspension criteria for image monitors and viewing boxes.
    Tingberg A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 23188811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
    Jung H; Kim HJ; Kang WS; Yoo SK; Fujioka K; Hasegawa M; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2155-64. PubMed ID: 15305470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
    Thompson DP; Koller CJ; Eatough JP
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):256-60. PubMed ID: 17038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
    Tao Y; Miao J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. O3-DPACS Open-Source Image-Data Manager/Archiver and HDW2 Image-Data Display: an IHE-compliant project pushing the e-health integration in the world.
    Inchingolo P; Beltrame M; Bosazzi P; Cicuta D; Faustini G; Mininel S; Poli A; Vatta F
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006; 30(6-7):391-406. PubMed ID: 17055700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment.
    Samei E; Seibert JA; Andriole K; Badano A; Crawford J; Reiner B; Flynn MJ; Chang P
    Radiographics; 2004; 24(1):313-34. PubMed ID: 14730055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The research and implementation of DICOM interface of medical imaging devices].
    Li X; Li L; Tong B; Xing H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):752-5. PubMed ID: 17899737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstations.
    Jervis SE; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):648-52. PubMed ID: 14500280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
    Wang J; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():216-8. PubMed ID: 12105732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
    Wang J; Compton K; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 12964056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparing a business justification for going electronic.
    Ortiz AO; Luyckx MP
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 11857990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video equipment testing: there's more to it than meets the eye.
    Levens S
    Telemed Telehealth Netw; 1996 Dec; 2(11):17-9. PubMed ID: 10165834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design requirements for radiology workstations.
    Moise A; Atkins MS
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Jun; 17(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 15085446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptance testing of integrated picture archiving and communications systems.
    Lewis TE; Horton MC; Kinsey TV; Shelton PD
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):163-5. PubMed ID: 10342200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The presentation of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and the initial experiences with its use].
    Bampo A; Duati M; Coran F; Balestreri L; Attanasio MA; Morassut S
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 9465243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques.
    Bennett WF; Vaswani KK; Mendiola JA; Spigos DG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():171-4. PubMed ID: 12105721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.