These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24069239)

  • 1. Who cries wolf, and when? Manipulation of perceived threats to preserve rank in cooperative groups.
    Barclay P; Benard S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73863. PubMed ID: 24069239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of social vs. asocial threats on group cooperation and manipulation of perceived threats.
    Barclay P; Benard S
    Evol Hum Sci; 2020; 2():e54. PubMed ID: 37588340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation.
    Gallo E; Yan C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(12):3647-52. PubMed ID: 25775544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen.
    Pleasant A; Barclay P
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):868-876. PubMed ID: 29708860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition over personal resources favors contribution to shared resources in human groups.
    Barker JL; Barclay P; Reeve HK
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58826. PubMed ID: 23520535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The hard problem of cooperation.
    Eriksson K; Strimling P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40325. PubMed ID: 22792282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Accuracy of judgment about others' cooperative behavior: effects of attractiveness and facial expressiveness].
    Shinada M; Yamagishi T; Tanida S; Takahashi C; Inukai K; Koizumi M; Yokota K; Mifune N; Takagishi H; Horita Y; Hashimoto H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2010 Jun; 81(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 20597359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Property Damage and Exposure to Other People in Distress Differentially Predict Prosocial Behavior After a Natural Disaster.
    Vardy T; Atkinson QD
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Apr; 30(4):563-575. PubMed ID: 30785368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.
    Kümmerli R; Burton-Chellew MN; Ross-Gillespie A; West SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jun; 107(22):10125-30. PubMed ID: 20479253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How the Distribution of Member Expectations Influences Cooperation and Competition in Groups: A Social Relations Model Analysis of Social Dilemmas.
    Ladbury JL; Hinsz VB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1502-1518. PubMed ID: 29742995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs for switching partners reduce network dynamics but not cooperative behaviour.
    Bednarik P; Fehl K; Semmann D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Oct; 281(1792):. PubMed ID: 25122233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Team reasoning-Experimental evidence on cooperation from centipede games.
    Graf Lambsdorff J; Giamattei M; Werner K; Schubert M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206666. PubMed ID: 30485306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.
    Hechler S; Neyer FJ; Kessler T
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():1-13. PubMed ID: 27568585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in in-group cooperation vary dynamically with competitive conditions and outcomes.
    Bailey DH; Winegard B; Oxford J; Geary DC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Mar; 10(1):102-19. PubMed ID: 22833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face structure predicts cooperation: men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient.
    Stirrat M; Perrett DI
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):718-22. PubMed ID: 22623509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional cooperation in group contests.
    Kiss HJ; Rosa-Garcia A; Zhukova V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244152. PubMed ID: 33362281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies.
    Romano A; Balliet D; Yamagishi T; Liu JH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12702-12707. PubMed ID: 29133403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From good institutions to generous citizens: Top-down incentives to cooperate promote subsequent prosociality but not norm enforcement.
    Stagnaro MN; Arechar AA; Rand DG
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():212-254. PubMed ID: 28249658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.
    Rand DG; Arbesman S; Christakis NA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Nov; 108(48):19193-8. PubMed ID: 22084103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare.
    Boyd R; Gintis H; Bowles S
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5978):617-20. PubMed ID: 20431013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.