BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24069641)

  • 1. [Self-sampling and reminder letters increase participation in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme].
    Virtanen A; Nieminen P; Malila N; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2013; 129(16):1709-17. PubMed ID: 24069641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving cervical cancer screening attendance in Finland.
    Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Malila N; Nieminen P
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(6):E677-84. PubMed ID: 25178683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for nonattendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: a randomized trial.
    Virtanen A; Nieminen P; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1960-9. PubMed ID: 21752985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.
    Virtanen A; Anttila A; Nieminen P
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26542953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland.
    Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
    Int J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 128(11):2681-7. PubMed ID: 20669228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-sampling to increase participation in cervical cancer screening: an RCT comparing home mailing, distribution in pharmacies, and recall letter.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Fortunato C; Barbarino P; Boveri S; Caroli S; Del Mistro A; Ferro A; Giammaria C; Manfredi M; Moretto T; Pasquini A; Sideri M; Tufi MC; Cogo C; Altobelli E;
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 112(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 25633037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
    Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
    Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates.
    MacLaughlin KL; Swanson KM; Naessens JM; Angstman KB; Chaudhry R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 24237657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The potential role of self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening.
    Schmeink CE; Bekkers RL; Massuger LF; Melchers WJ
    Rev Med Virol; 2011 May; 21(3):139-53. PubMed ID: 21538664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of scheduled appointments on cervical screening participation in Norway: a randomised intervention.
    Lönnberg S; Andreassen T; Engesæter B; Lilleng R; Kleven C; Skare A; Johansson K; Fredheim CS; Tropé A
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013728. PubMed ID: 28186949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of second reminder invitation on uptake of screening and cancer detection in BreastCheck.
    Fleming P; Mooney T; Fitzpatrick P
    Ir Med J; 2012 Jan; 105(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 22397204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: comparison of a brush-based and a lavage-based cervicovaginal self-sampling device.
    Karjalainen L; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Luostarinen T; Virtanen A
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():221. PubMed ID: 26979237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-specific effectiveness of the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme.
    Lönnberg S; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1354-61. PubMed ID: 22665576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing among Non-Attenders Increases Attendance to the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.
    Enerly E; Bonde J; Schee K; Pedersen H; Lönnberg S; Nygård M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0151978. PubMed ID: 27073929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.
    Bowles EJ; Gao H; Brandzel S; Bradford SC; Buist DS
    Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():19-27. PubMed ID: 26820221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Verdoodt F; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P; Racey CS; Snijders PJ; Arbyn M
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Nov; 51(16):2375-85. PubMed ID: 26296294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized study of two reminding strategies: telephone versus mail in the screening of cervical cancer in women who did not initially respond.
    Heranney D; Fender M; Velten M; Baldauf JJ
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 21791902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.