170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24069729)
1. Justice in human research ethics. A conceptual and practical guide.
Pieper I; Thomson CJ
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2013 Mar; 31(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 24069729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
Dyck M; Allen G
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vulnerability in human research.
Pieper IJ; Thomson CJH
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 May; 38(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 32342442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dunn M
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):527-8. PubMed ID: 23118467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Research protocol VIII. The ethics of research on human subjects].
Miranda-Novales MG; Villasís-Keever MÁ
Rev Alerg Mex; 2019; 66(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 31013412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Do the Various Principles of Justice Mean Within the Concept of Benefit Sharing?
Dauda B; Denier Y; Dierickx K
J Bioeth Inq; 2016 Jun; 13(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 26825296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethics and practical justice in the post-COVID-19 era.
Ogbogu U; Hardcastle L
Dev World Bioeth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 33210409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit sharing in the revised Indian National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants.
Ravinetto R; Dierickx K
Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 30211675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics?: conceptual clarifications.
Rehbock T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Oct; 20(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21843383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Justice in the application of science: beyond fair benefits.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):54-6. PubMed ID: 20526976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beneficence as a principle in human research.
Pieper I; Thomson CJ
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2016 Jun; 34(2):117-135. PubMed ID: 27423872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Justice, fairness, and membership in a class: conceptual confusions and moral puzzles in the regulation of human subjects research.
Iltis AS
J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(3):488-501. PubMed ID: 21871044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How not to argue against mandatory ethics review.
Hunter D
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):521-4. PubMed ID: 23236085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individualism and the ethics of research on humans.
Wilkinson TM
HEC Forum; 2004 Mar; 16(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 15181667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical principles in health research and review process.
Tangwa GB
Acta Trop; 2009 Nov; 112 Suppl 1():S2-7. PubMed ID: 19665441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A taxonomy of value in clinical research.
Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD
IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.
;
J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(3):4-13. PubMed ID: 25951677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics of international clinical research collaboration - the experience of AlloStem.
Chaplin C
Int J Immunogenet; 2006 Feb; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16426234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics and stem cell therapeutics for cardiovascular disease.
Sugarman J
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2007; 50(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17631433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medical research-ethics applied to social sciences: relevance, limits, issues and necessary adjustments].
Desclaux A
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2008 Apr; 101(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18543697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
