These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2406981)
1. A new device for the detection of sponges and other foreign objects left accidentally in the operative field. Marincola F; Siao D; Marincola E; Annoni F; Holder WD Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Mar; 170(3):259-60. PubMed ID: 2406981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. Macario A; Morris D; Morris S Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges. Bardes JM; Inaba K Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electronic tagging of surgical sponges to prevent their accidental retention. Fabian CE Surgery; 2005 Mar; 137(3):298-301. PubMed ID: 15746781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Editor's note: Retained foreign bodies--why do we still allow them to occur? Sarr MG Surgery; 2005 Mar; 137(3):304-5. PubMed ID: 15746783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevention of retained foreign objects. Brisson P Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 94(11):28-31. PubMed ID: 21452792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study. Steelman VM Am J Surg; 2011 Feb; 201(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21266216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian Association of General Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 9. Risk factors for retained foreign bodies after surgery. McLeod RS; Bohnen JM; Can J Surg; 2004 Feb; 47(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 14997928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A magnetic probe to retrieve broken metallic parts of instruments during laparoscopic procedures. Kandioler-Eckersberger D; Niederle B; Herbst F; Wenzl E Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):208-9. PubMed ID: 11961641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retained foreign bodies during surgery in pediatric patients: a national perspective. Shah RK; Lander L J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Apr; 44(4):738-42. PubMed ID: 19361633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Society of interventional radiology position statement: prevention of unintentionally retained foreign bodies during interventional radiology procedures. Statler JD; Miller DL; Dixon RG; Kuo MD; Cohen AM; Duncan JR; Gordon RL; Gross K; Saad WE; Silberzweig JE; Stecker MS; Suri R; Thornton RH; Bartal G; J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1561-2. PubMed ID: 21937240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A pacemaker to eliminate interference with the electromagnetic flowmeter. Holland BM; Tucker CE Biomed Sci Instrum; 1975; 11():11-4. PubMed ID: 123794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Egorova NN; Moskowitz A; Gelijns A; Weinberg A; Curty J; Rabin-Fastman B; Kaplan H; Cooper M; Fowler D; Emond JC; Greco G Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 18156916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]