144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24070074)
1. Structural analysis for Wingspan stent in a perforator model.
Fujimoto M; Shobayashi Y; Takemoto K; Tateshima S; Viñuela F
Interv Neuroradiol; 2013 Sep; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 24070074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated with time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models.
LaDisa JF; Olson LE; Guler I; Hettrick DA; Kersten JR; Warltier DC; Pagel PS
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Mar; 98(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 15531564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Our capricious vessels: The influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment.
De Bock S; Iannaccone F; De Santis G; De Beule M; Mortier P; Verhegghe B; Segers P
J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1353-9. PubMed ID: 22483228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal correlation between wall shear stress and in-stent stenosis after Wingspan stent in swine model.
Fujimoto M; Takao H; Suzuki T; Shobayashi Y; Mayor F; Tateshima S; Yamamoto M; Murayama Y; Viñuela F
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 May; 35(5):994-8. PubMed ID: 24231853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New variable porosity flow diverter (VPOD) stent design for treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms.
Suri H; Ionita CN; Baier RE; Rudin S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1105-8. PubMed ID: 22254507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical responses after Wingspan Stent deployment in swine ascending pharyngeal artery.
Fujimoto M; Shobayashi Y; Tateshima S; Vinters HV; Viñuela F
Neurol Res; 2013 Jan; 35(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 23317803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Cardiocoil stent-artery interaction.
Brand M; Ryvkin M; Einav S; Slepyan L
J Biomech Eng; 2005 Apr; 127(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 15971712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anomalous hemodynamic effects of a self-expanding intracranial stent: comparing in-vitro and ex-vivo models using ultra-high resolution microCT based CFD.
Benndorf G; Ionescu M; Valdivia y Alvarado M; Biondi A; Hipp J; Metcalfe R
J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 19926087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of stent mis-sizing and mis-positioning on coronary fluid wall shear and intramural stress.
Chen HY; Koo BK; Bhatt DL; Kassab GS
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2013 Jul; 115(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 23722708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements.
Levitt MR; McGah PM; Aliseda A; Mourad PD; Nerva JD; Vaidya SS; Morton RP; Ghodke BV; Kim LJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 23868162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fatigue behaviour of Nitinol peripheral stents: the role of plaque shape studied with computational structural analyses.
Dordoni E; Meoli A; Wu W; Dubini G; Migliavacca F; Pennati G; Petrini L
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jul; 36(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 24721457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial stent strut angle influences wall shear stress after stent implantation: analysis using 3D computational fluid dynamics models of stent foreshortening.
LaDisa JF; Olson LE; Hettrick DA; Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():59. PubMed ID: 16250918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics.
Kim M; Taulbee DB; Tremmel M; Meng H
Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 36(5):726-41. PubMed ID: 18264766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of prolapse in cardiovascular stents: a constitutive equation for vascular tissue and finite-element modelling.
Prendergast PJ; Lally C; Daly S; Reid AJ; Lee TC; Quinn D; Dolan F
J Biomech Eng; 2003 Oct; 125(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 14618928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angular remodeling in single stent-assisted coiling displaces and attenuates the flow impingement zone at the neck of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.
Gao B; Baharoglu MI; Malek AM
Neurosurgery; 2013 May; 72(5):739-48; discussion 748. PubMed ID: 23328687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison among different high porosity stent configurations: hemodynamic effects of treatment in a large cerebral aneurysm.
Roszelle BN; Nair P; Gonzalez LF; Haithem Babiker M; Ryan J; Frakes D
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Feb; 136(2):021013. PubMed ID: 24337100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the stent expansion in a stenosed artery using finite element method: application to stent versus stent study.
Imani SM; Goudarzi AM; Ghasemi SE; Kalani A; Mahdinejad J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Oct; 228(10):996-1004. PubMed ID: 25406228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blood flow in stented arteries: a parametric comparison of strut design patterns in three dimensions.
He Y; Duraiswamy N; Frank AO; Moore JE
J Biomech Eng; 2005 Aug; 127(4):637-47. PubMed ID: 16121534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-aneurysmal flow with helix and mesh stent placement across side-wall aneurysm pore of a straight parent vessel.
Liou TM; Liou SN; Chu KL
J Biomech Eng; 2004 Feb; 126(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15171127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of simulated structural deformation with experimental results after Wingspan stenting.
Fujimoto M; Shobayashi Y; Tateshima S; Sudo R; Tanishita K; Viñuela F
Neurol Res; 2014 Aug; 36(8):752-6. PubMed ID: 24620967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
