These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24071547)
1. Outcomes of long tapered hydroxyapatite-coated stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. Makani A; Kim TW; Kamath AF; Garino JP; Lee GC J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):827-30. PubMed ID: 24071547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration]. Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem. Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seven-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. Cho JH; Garino JP; Choo SK; Han KY; Kim JH; Oh HK Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Dec; 2(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 21119937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up. Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy. Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun IR Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):569-577. PubMed ID: 28300706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations]. Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Femoral Stem Design on Failure After Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. Cidambi KR; Barnett SL; Mallette PR; Patel JJ; Nassif NA; Gorab RS J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):800-804. PubMed ID: 29137901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem. Malhotra R; Dua A; Kiran EK; Bhan S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 17457595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. Froimson MI; Garino J; Machenaud A; Vidalain JP J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17197301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects. Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component]. Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Hydroxyapatite-coated stems in total hip arthroplasty after a minimum 10-years follow-up. Gallo J; Landor I; Cechová I; Jahoda D Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Oct; 75(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19026187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in younger patients: findings from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Paulsen A; Pedersen AB; Johnsen SP; Riis A; Lucht U; Overgaard S Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):622-8. PubMed ID: 17966021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients. Parsch D; Jung AW; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1081-5. PubMed ID: 17876593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydroxyapatite-coated tapered cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Chambers B; St Clair SF; Froimson MI J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):71-4. PubMed ID: 17570282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless stem: mid-term follow up. Jibodh SR; Schwarzkopf R; Anthony SG; Malchau H; Dempsey KE; Estok DM J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1167-72. PubMed ID: 23114191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]