These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24071605)

  • 21. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique.
    Martorelli M; Ausiello P; Morrone R
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 24412585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional reconstruction of teeth and jaws based on segmentation of CT images using watershed transformation.
    Naumovich SS; Naumovich SA; Goncharenko VG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140313. PubMed ID: 25564886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing cone beam CT scan height as a method of radiation reduction for photorealistic three-dimensional orthognathic planning.
    Lin CY; Hsung TC; Khambay B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):907-12. PubMed ID: 25976036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new, highly precise measurement technology for the in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of digital imaging data.
    von Wilmowsky C; Bergauer B; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Keller A; Eitner S; Matta RE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1335-9. PubMed ID: 26189144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
    Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linear accuracy and reliability of volume data sets acquired by two CBCT-devices and an MSCT using virtual models: a comparative in-vitro study.
    Wikner J; Hanken H; Eulenburg C; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Riecke B; Friedrich RE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25936361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines.
    Shaheen E; Khalil W; Ezeldeen M; Van de Casteele E; Sun Y; Politis C; Jacobs R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jan; 123(1):123-128. PubMed ID: 27938942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the volumetric measurement of a simulated maxillary alveolar bone defect using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kasaven CP; Ivekovic S; McIntyre GT; Gillgrass T; Thomson DA; Menhinick A; Mossey PA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2013 Nov; 50(6):e115-20. PubMed ID: 23157577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
    Liang YH; Jiang L; Chen C; Gao XJ; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
    Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity.
    Hohlweg-Majert B; Metzger MC; Kummer T; Schulze D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 21030266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.