These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24074393)

  • 21. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dentists' use of digital radiographic techniques: Part I - intraoral X-ray: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists.
    Svenson B; Ståhlnacke K; Karlsson R; Fält A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2018 Mar; 76(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 29019273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
    Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
    N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
    Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survey of dental radiographic equipment and radiation doses in Finland.
    Havukainen R
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 3408611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A questionnaire study to derive information on the working environment, clinical training, use of ancillary staff and optimization of patient radiation dose within UK dental practice.
    Orafi I; Rushton VE
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):763-72. PubMed ID: 22486707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene.
    White SC; Mallya SM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 22376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comprehensive optimization process of paranasal sinus radiography.
    Saarakkala S; Nironen K; Hermunen H; Aarnio J; Heikkinen JO
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 19235578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation exposure in dental radiology: a 1998 nationwide survey in Switzerland.
    Aroua A; Buchillier-Decka I; Dula K; Nedjadi Y; Perrier M; Vader JP; Valley JF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):211-9. PubMed ID: 15533973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient radiation doses in intraoral and panoramic X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II; Abdelgadir AH
    Phys Med; 2018 Feb; 46():148-152. PubMed ID: 29519401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mentoring. A quality assurance tool for dentists. Part 1: the need for mentoring in dental practice.
    Holt VP; Ladwa R
    Prim Dent Care; 2008 Oct; 15(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 18826769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.